Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

The reproducibility of the Bruce protocol exercise test for the determination of aerobic capacity in older women.

The reproducibility of the Bruce exercise test protocol for the determination of maximal aerobic activity was evaluated in sedentary older women. Seventeen women between the ages of 51 and 68 yr performed five maximal graded exercise tests to volitional fatigue on a treadmill. VO2max (mL.kg-1.min-1) values averaged 27.5 +/- 1.1; 28.3 +/- 1.3; 28.4 +/- 1.3; 29.6 +/- 1.5; and 28.2 +/- 1.4 for trials 1-5, respectively, and were not significantly different. Criteria for a plateau in VO2 at the point of exhaustion were met in 21 out of 85 tests (25%). The mean coefficient of variation VO2max for the subjects for the 5 tests was 6.5% (range, 2.0-14%). Pearson's correlation coefficients for the study variables were significant, indicating good agreement between repeated tests (r2: between 0.70 to 0.89). Although there were no significant differences among the mean VO2max values in the 5 trials, 11 subjects had a 1.0 ml.kg-1.min-1 or greater increase in the VO2max from test 1 to test 2, and only 6 subjects had no change or a decrease in VO2max. The mean difference between T2 and T3 was lower (T1 vs T2: 0.8 mL.kg-1.min-1, T2 vs T3: 0.1 mL.kg-1.min-1) indicating slightly better agreement between the second and third set. Estimates of the between and within subject variance revealed a low within subject variance (4.2 (mL.kg-1.min-1)2) compared to the between subject variance (22.1 (mL.kg-1.min-1)2). This study demonstrates that a commonly used exercise testing protocol generates highly reproducible measurements of VO2max in women between 51 and 68 yr. The mean differences between tests and the high level of agreement between repeated tests suggests that a single measurement of VO2max can be performed to assess functional aerobic capacity in this population.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app