We have located open access text paper links.
An Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Timolol Maleate 0.5% Microdrops Administered with the Nanodropper®.
Ophthalmology 2024 March 15
OBJECTIVE OR PURPOSE: Examine if 12.5 μL timolol maleate 0.5% microdrops dispensed with the Nanodropper® Adaptor provide non-inferior intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction compared to conventional, 28 μL drops in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT) patients.
DESIGN: Prospective, non-inferiority, parallel, multicenter, single-masked, active-controlled, randomized trial.
SUBJECTS, PARTICIPANTS, AND/OR CONTROLS: Treatment-naïve subjects that were recently diagnosed with OAG/OHT at the Aravind Eye Care System.
METHODS, INTERVENTION, OR TESTING: Both eyes of subjects received either one commercially available drop or one microdrop of timolol maleate 0.5%. We measured IOP, resting heart rate (HR), and blood pressure (BP) at baseline and 1, 2, 5, and 8 hours after timolol administration.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: IOP was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes were resting HR, systolic BP (sBP), and diastolic BP (dBP).
RESULTS: Adaptor-mediated microdrops and conventional drops of timolol significantly decreased IOP compared to baseline at all timepoints. Non-inferiority was established at three of four timepoints. HR decreases with Nanodropper were ∼3 bpm less than with conventional drops.
CONCLUSIONS: Timolol microdrops appear to be as effective in ocular hypotensive action as conventional drops with a slightly lesser effect on resting HR and BP.
DESIGN: Prospective, non-inferiority, parallel, multicenter, single-masked, active-controlled, randomized trial.
SUBJECTS, PARTICIPANTS, AND/OR CONTROLS: Treatment-naïve subjects that were recently diagnosed with OAG/OHT at the Aravind Eye Care System.
METHODS, INTERVENTION, OR TESTING: Both eyes of subjects received either one commercially available drop or one microdrop of timolol maleate 0.5%. We measured IOP, resting heart rate (HR), and blood pressure (BP) at baseline and 1, 2, 5, and 8 hours after timolol administration.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: IOP was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes were resting HR, systolic BP (sBP), and diastolic BP (dBP).
RESULTS: Adaptor-mediated microdrops and conventional drops of timolol significantly decreased IOP compared to baseline at all timepoints. Non-inferiority was established at three of four timepoints. HR decreases with Nanodropper were ∼3 bpm less than with conventional drops.
CONCLUSIONS: Timolol microdrops appear to be as effective in ocular hypotensive action as conventional drops with a slightly lesser effect on resting HR and BP.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.Rheumatology 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app