We have located links that may give you full text access.
Diagnostic Utility of Immunocytochemistryby Using Liquid-Based-Cytology(LBC) Slides.
Folia Histochemica et Cytobiologica 2024 Februrary 26
INTRODUCTION: Cytological specimens, such as fine needle aspirations (FNAs) and exfoliative cytology samples, offer a minimally invasive avenue for diagnostic purposes. Liquid-based-cytology (LBC), initially designed for cervical cytology, has gained prominence as an alternative technique for nongynecological cytology. immunocytochemistry (ICC) is an ancillary method using mostly used entities exhibit morphological overlap, or cellular origin requires clarification. This study aims to assess ICC's diagnostic utility when applied to LBC slides and to evaluate its efficacy concerning residual material waiting time.
METHODS: In total, 74cases underwent examination, with ICC applied to LBC slides if cell blocks were unavailable or insufficient for 12-month period. The cases with sufficient cell blocks were excluded from study. For main LBC cytology slidesSurePath pap test kit was used. For ICC study 1-4 PAP-stained LBC slides were obtained from each case's residual material. The slides were thenstained with primary antibody.
RESULTS: Effective results for ICC study were obtained in 81% of cases. The samples were categorized into groups based on the waiting time of residual LBC material for ICC analysis: 1-5 days, 6-10 days, 11-20 days, and 20-40 days. Comparative analysis revealed a decline in ICC efficacy as the waiting time increased. In addition, a statistically significant difference was observed between the 11-20 days and 20-40 days groups (p<0.05). An analysis of 142 LBC slides stained immunocytochemically revealed that nuclear markers exhibited higher effectiveness compared to non-nuclear markers, although no significant difference was detected between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The high rates and effective results can be obtained in ICC studies performed on additional slides obtained from residual material of LBC up to the first 20 days. ICC applied to LBC slides is an important and useful alternative for diagnostic and prognostic markers in cases where cell block does not ocur or is insufficient.
METHODS: In total, 74cases underwent examination, with ICC applied to LBC slides if cell blocks were unavailable or insufficient for 12-month period. The cases with sufficient cell blocks were excluded from study. For main LBC cytology slidesSurePath pap test kit was used. For ICC study 1-4 PAP-stained LBC slides were obtained from each case's residual material. The slides were thenstained with primary antibody.
RESULTS: Effective results for ICC study were obtained in 81% of cases. The samples were categorized into groups based on the waiting time of residual LBC material for ICC analysis: 1-5 days, 6-10 days, 11-20 days, and 20-40 days. Comparative analysis revealed a decline in ICC efficacy as the waiting time increased. In addition, a statistically significant difference was observed between the 11-20 days and 20-40 days groups (p<0.05). An analysis of 142 LBC slides stained immunocytochemically revealed that nuclear markers exhibited higher effectiveness compared to non-nuclear markers, although no significant difference was detected between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: The high rates and effective results can be obtained in ICC studies performed on additional slides obtained from residual material of LBC up to the first 20 days. ICC applied to LBC slides is an important and useful alternative for diagnostic and prognostic markers in cases where cell block does not ocur or is insufficient.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Light chain deposition disease: pathogenesis, clinical characteristics and treatment strategies.Annals of Hematology 2024 August 28
Hodgkin lymphoma: 2025 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 September 6
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app