End-to-end validation of fiducial tracking accuracy in robotic radiosurgery using MRI-only simulation imaging.

BACKGROUND: Image-guided radiation-therapy (IGRT)-based robotic radiosurgery using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only simulation could allow for improved target definition with highly conformal radiotherapy treatments. Fiducial marker (FM)-based alignment is used with robotic radiosurgery treatments of sites such as the prostate because it aids in accurate target localization. Synthetic CT (sCT) images are generated in the MRI-only workflow but FMs used for IGRT appear as signal voids in MRIs and do not appear in MR-generated sCTs, hindering the ability to use sCTs for fiducial-based IGRT.

PURPOSE: In this study we evaluate the fiducial tracking accuracy for a novel artificial fiducial insertion method in sCT images that allows for fiducial marker tracking in robotic radiosurgery, using MRI-only simulation imaging (MRI-only workflow).

METHODS: Artificial fiducial markers were inserted into sCT images at the site of the real marker implantation as visible in MRI. Two phantoms were used in this study. A custom anthropomorphic pelvis phantom was designed to validate the tracking accuracy for a variety of artificial fiducials in an MRI-only workflow. A head phantom containing a hidden target and orthogonal film pair inserts was used to perform end-to-end tests of artificial fiducial configurations inserted in sCT images. The setup and end-to-end targeting accuracy of the MRI-only workflow were compared to the computed tomography (CT)-based standard. Each phantom had six FMs implanted with a minimum spacing of 2 cm. For each phantom a bulk-density sCT was generated, and artificial FMs were inserted at the implantation location. Several methods of FM insertion were tested including: (1) replacing HU with a fixed value (10000HU) (voxel-burned); (2) using a representative fiducial image derived from a linear combination of fiducial templates (composite-fiducial); (3) computationally simulating FM signal voids using a digital phantom containing FMs and inserting the corresponding signal void into sCT images (simulated-fiducial). All tests were performed on a CyberKnife system (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA). Treatment plans and digital-reconstructed-radiographs were generated from the original CT and sCTs with embedded fiducials and used to align the phantom on the treatment couch. Differences in the initial phantom alignment (3D translations/rotations) and tracking parameters between CT-based plans and sCT-based plans were analyzed. End-to-end plans for both scenarios were generated and analyzed following our clinical protocol.

RESULTS: For all plans, the fiducial tracking algorithm was able to identify the fiducial locations. The mean FM-extraction uncertainty for the composite and simulated FMs was below 48% for fiducials in both the anthropomorphic pelvis and end-to-end phantoms, which is below the 70% treatment uncertainty threshold. The total targeting error was within tolerance (<0.95 mm) for end-to-end tests of sCT images with the composite and head-on simulated FMs (0.26, 0.44, and 0.35 mm for the composite fiducial in sCT, head-on simulated fiducial in sCT, and fiducials in original CT, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: MRI-only simulation for robotic radiosurgery could potentially improve treatment accuracy and reduce planning margins. Our study has shown that using a composite-derived or simulated FM in conjunction with sCT images, MRI-only workflow can provide clinically acceptable setup accuracy in line with CT-based standards for FM-based robotic radiosurgery.