We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein predict infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients.
Leukemia Research 2021 June
INTRODUCTION: Procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are known inflammatory markers of severe infection; however, their ability to differentiate between infections of different origins is not clear yet. In this study, we evaluated PCT and CRP as markers of infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients.
METHODS: Blood samples were collected to determine serum concentrations of PCT, CRP, d-Dimer, and to perform blood culture analysis. Based on blood culture results, the patients were divided into two groups-positive blood culture (n = 271) patients and negative blood culture patients (n = 668); the negative blood culture group served as the control. The positive blood culture group was further divided into three groups based on the etiological agent of infection. PCT and CRP concentrations were compared, and ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff values were calculated.
RESULTS: PCT levels in infected patients were significantly higher than those in control patients (p < 0.001); similarly, CRP and d-Dimer levels were also higher among infected patients when compared with those in the controls. A PCT level of 0.51 ng/mL was the best threshold for detecting the infection, with an AUC-ROC of 0.877, whereas the best threshold for CRP was 49.20 mg/L. PCT levels were the highest in patients with gram-negative bacteremia as compared to in those with gram-positive bacteremia and fungal infection. The optimal cutoff value of PCT for the detection of gram-negative and gram-positive infection was 1.63 ng/mL.
CONCLUSION: PCT seems to be a useful marker for the diagnosis of systemic infection in HSCT patients, probably better than CRP and d-Dimer.
METHODS: Blood samples were collected to determine serum concentrations of PCT, CRP, d-Dimer, and to perform blood culture analysis. Based on blood culture results, the patients were divided into two groups-positive blood culture (n = 271) patients and negative blood culture patients (n = 668); the negative blood culture group served as the control. The positive blood culture group was further divided into three groups based on the etiological agent of infection. PCT and CRP concentrations were compared, and ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity, and cutoff values were calculated.
RESULTS: PCT levels in infected patients were significantly higher than those in control patients (p < 0.001); similarly, CRP and d-Dimer levels were also higher among infected patients when compared with those in the controls. A PCT level of 0.51 ng/mL was the best threshold for detecting the infection, with an AUC-ROC of 0.877, whereas the best threshold for CRP was 49.20 mg/L. PCT levels were the highest in patients with gram-negative bacteremia as compared to in those with gram-positive bacteremia and fungal infection. The optimal cutoff value of PCT for the detection of gram-negative and gram-positive infection was 1.63 ng/mL.
CONCLUSION: PCT seems to be a useful marker for the diagnosis of systemic infection in HSCT patients, probably better than CRP and d-Dimer.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app