JOURNAL ARTICLE

A Randomized Trial of Convalescent Plasma in Covid-19 Severe Pneumonia

Ventura A Simonovich, Leandro D Burgos Pratx, Paula Scibona, María V Beruto, Marcelo G Vallone, Carolina Vázquez, Nadia Savoy, Diego H Giunta, Lucía G Pérez, Marisa Del L Sánchez, Andrea Vanesa Gamarnik, Diego S Ojeda, Diego M Santoro, Pablo J Camino, Sebastian Antelo, Karina Rainero, Gabriela P Vidiella, Erica A Miyazaki, Wanda Cornistein, Omar A Trabadelo, Fernando M Ross, Mariano Spotti, Gabriel Funtowicz, Walter E Scordo, Marcelo H Losso, Inés Ferniot, Pablo E Pardo, Eulalia Rodriguez, Pablo Rucci, Julieta Pasquali, Nora A Fuentes, Mariano Esperatti, Gerardo A Speroni, Esteban C Nannini, Alejandra Matteaccio, Hernán G Michelangelo, Dean Follmann, H Clifford Lane, Waldo H Belloso
New England Journal of Medicine 2020 November 24
33232588

BACKGROUND: Convalescent plasma is frequently administered to patients with Covid-19 and has been reported, largely on the basis of observational data, to improve clinical outcomes. Minimal data are available from adequately powered randomized, controlled trials.

METHODS: We randomly assigned hospitalized adult patients with severe Covid-19 pneumonia in a 2:1 ratio to receive convalescent plasma or placebo. The primary outcome was the patient's clinical status 30 days after the intervention, as measured on a six-point ordinal scale ranging from total recovery to death.

RESULTS: A total of 228 patients were assigned to receive convalescent plasma and 105 to receive placebo. The median time from the onset of symptoms to enrollment in the trial was 8 days (interquartile range, 5 to 10), and hypoxemia was the most frequent severity criterion for enrollment. The infused convalescent plasma had a median titer of 1:3200 of total SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (interquartile range, 1:800 to 1:3200]. No patients were lost to follow-up. At day 30 day, no significant difference was noted between the convalescent plasma group and the placebo group in the distribution of clinical outcomes according to the ordinal scale (odds ratio, 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52 to 1.35; P = 0.46). Overall mortality was 10.96% in the convalescent plasma group and 11.43% in the placebo group, for a risk difference of -0.46 percentage points (95% CI, -7.8 to 6.8). Total SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers tended to be higher in the convalescent plasma group at day 2 after the intervention. Adverse events and serious adverse events were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences were observed in clinical status or overall mortality between patients treated with convalescent plasma and those who received placebo. (PlasmAr ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04383535.).

Full Text Links

We have located open access full text paper links.

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Trending Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
33232588
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"