We have located links that may give you full text access.
Novel multi-axial alveolar distractor - Part I: Design, manufacture, and mechanical/functional tests.
Journal of Cranio-maxillo-facial Surgery 2019 Februrary 21
PURPOSE: This study developed a novel multi-axial alveolar distractor and evaluated its safety and effectiveness by performing various mechanical tests and finite element (FE) analysis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A ball-and-socket joint with a high degree of freedom was proposed as the design concept to make the distractor produce a cone trajectory motion range of up to 60° with respect to the transport screw (central axis). This device was manufactured with Ti6Al4V alloy. Mechanical functional tests included four-point bending resistance testing of the base bone plate, pull-out testing of the multi-axial alveolar distractor, welding strength testing between the base bone plate and ball-and-socket joint mechanism, and torque strength testing of the ball-and-socket joint. These tests were performed to ensure the effectiveness and safety of the multi-axial alveolar distractor. The base bone plate FE analysis of four-point bending resistance and pull-out testing of the multi-axial alveolar distractor were performed to confirm the results obtained from the experimental testing.
RESULTS: The bending strength for the four-point bending test and the maximum force for pull-out testing were 530.88 N mm and 716.33 N, respectively. Substantial equivalence FE simulations also found that large deformations for four-point bending and pull-out testing were smaller than those for the commercial alveolar distractor, indicating that our new distractor is as safe and effective as the commercially available device. The maximum debonding torque resistance for ball-and-socket joint mechanism welding strength was 3481.1 N mm, meaning it is unable to fall off during a surgical operation. No damage was found at the welding edge. The maximum average resistance force in the ball-and-socket joint was 30.26 N without rotation, allowing it to resist distraction forces during bone regeneration - an important safety consideration.
CONCLUSION: The alveolar distractor designed using a ball-and-socket joint concept can achieve multi-axial distraction with various angle adjustments in 3D space. Thorough mechanical/functional tests confirm the effectiveness and safety of our new multi-axial alveolar distractor.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A ball-and-socket joint with a high degree of freedom was proposed as the design concept to make the distractor produce a cone trajectory motion range of up to 60° with respect to the transport screw (central axis). This device was manufactured with Ti6Al4V alloy. Mechanical functional tests included four-point bending resistance testing of the base bone plate, pull-out testing of the multi-axial alveolar distractor, welding strength testing between the base bone plate and ball-and-socket joint mechanism, and torque strength testing of the ball-and-socket joint. These tests were performed to ensure the effectiveness and safety of the multi-axial alveolar distractor. The base bone plate FE analysis of four-point bending resistance and pull-out testing of the multi-axial alveolar distractor were performed to confirm the results obtained from the experimental testing.
RESULTS: The bending strength for the four-point bending test and the maximum force for pull-out testing were 530.88 N mm and 716.33 N, respectively. Substantial equivalence FE simulations also found that large deformations for four-point bending and pull-out testing were smaller than those for the commercial alveolar distractor, indicating that our new distractor is as safe and effective as the commercially available device. The maximum debonding torque resistance for ball-and-socket joint mechanism welding strength was 3481.1 N mm, meaning it is unable to fall off during a surgical operation. No damage was found at the welding edge. The maximum average resistance force in the ball-and-socket joint was 30.26 N without rotation, allowing it to resist distraction forces during bone regeneration - an important safety consideration.
CONCLUSION: The alveolar distractor designed using a ball-and-socket joint concept can achieve multi-axial distraction with various angle adjustments in 3D space. Thorough mechanical/functional tests confirm the effectiveness and safety of our new multi-axial alveolar distractor.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app