We have located links that may give you full text access.
An imputation method for calculating and comparing autoimmune disease incidence using partial case review.
Vaccine 2017 December 5
PURPOSE: Estimate incidence of autoimmune conditions in a population who received HPV4 vaccine and a comparison unvaccinated population. Electronic health record (EHR) data may contain inaccurate or incomplete coding, while manual chart review of all cases may not be feasible. We propose a method to estimate incidence using EHR data and case review for a sample.
METHODS: Suspected incident cases were identified using ICD-9 codes, laboratory results and medications related to the condition. A random sample of charts was reviewed to confirm the diagnosis and determine disease onset date. Multiple imputation, using a Monte Carlo model including age and disease indicators was used to impute case status of non-reviewed cases. Incidence rate was calculated in each imputed dataset, with median and percentiles giving a distribution for the estimated incidence rate. Sensitivity analyses compared modeled results to results without imputation and results where imputation was applied to the subset of cases identified using specific ICD-9 codes.
RESULTS: The model accounted for differential case confirmation rates by age and method of case identification, identifying a potential safety signal that was missed relying on EHR data alone.
CONCLUSIONS: This method may be useful for computing incidence when full case review is not feasible.
METHODS: Suspected incident cases were identified using ICD-9 codes, laboratory results and medications related to the condition. A random sample of charts was reviewed to confirm the diagnosis and determine disease onset date. Multiple imputation, using a Monte Carlo model including age and disease indicators was used to impute case status of non-reviewed cases. Incidence rate was calculated in each imputed dataset, with median and percentiles giving a distribution for the estimated incidence rate. Sensitivity analyses compared modeled results to results without imputation and results where imputation was applied to the subset of cases identified using specific ICD-9 codes.
RESULTS: The model accounted for differential case confirmation rates by age and method of case identification, identifying a potential safety signal that was missed relying on EHR data alone.
CONCLUSIONS: This method may be useful for computing incidence when full case review is not feasible.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.Rheumatology 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app