We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Prognostic value of preoperative NLR, dNLR, PLR and CRP in surgical renal cell carcinoma patients.
World Journal of Urology 2017 Februrary
BACKGROUND: Emerging evidences indicate that inflammation plays a crucial role in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. Inflammatory response biomarkers are recognized as promising prognostic factors for improving predictive accuracy in renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in RCC.
METHODS: 484 surgical RCC patients were enrolled from 2006 to 2010 in this study. Receiver operating curve (ROC) was applied to assess the optimal cutoff levels for four biomarkers, and the prognostic values were determined by Kaplan-Meier curve, univariate and multivariate COX regression models. The predictive accuracy was evaluated by concordance index (c-index).
RESULTS: The median follow-up duration after surgical resection was 36 months. The optimal cutoff levels were 2.78 for NLR, 2.05 for dNLR, 185 for PLR and 5.1 for CRP by ROC curves analysis. Elevated NLR, dNLR, PLR and CRP were significantly correlated with worse overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis showed that elevated NLR was an independent risk factor for OS, and NLR was superior to dNLR, PLR and CRP based on hazard ratio (HR 2.10, 95 % CI 1.21-3.64, P = 0.008). Additionally, the nomogram could more effectively work in predicting OS (c-index: 0.749) in surgical RCC patients.
CONCLUSION: Pre-operation NLR can be considered as a potential prognostic biomarker in patients with RCC who underwent surgical resection.
METHODS: 484 surgical RCC patients were enrolled from 2006 to 2010 in this study. Receiver operating curve (ROC) was applied to assess the optimal cutoff levels for four biomarkers, and the prognostic values were determined by Kaplan-Meier curve, univariate and multivariate COX regression models. The predictive accuracy was evaluated by concordance index (c-index).
RESULTS: The median follow-up duration after surgical resection was 36 months. The optimal cutoff levels were 2.78 for NLR, 2.05 for dNLR, 185 for PLR and 5.1 for CRP by ROC curves analysis. Elevated NLR, dNLR, PLR and CRP were significantly correlated with worse overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis showed that elevated NLR was an independent risk factor for OS, and NLR was superior to dNLR, PLR and CRP based on hazard ratio (HR 2.10, 95 % CI 1.21-3.64, P = 0.008). Additionally, the nomogram could more effectively work in predicting OS (c-index: 0.749) in surgical RCC patients.
CONCLUSION: Pre-operation NLR can be considered as a potential prognostic biomarker in patients with RCC who underwent surgical resection.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app