Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Foetal tachyarrhythmia treatment remains challenging even if the vast majority of cases have a favourable outcome.

Acta Paediatrica 2015 November
AIM: The optimal treatment for foetal tachyarrhythmia remains controversial, and this study aimed to fill this gap in the knowledge.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of foetal tachyarrhythmia diagnosed at two tertiary foetal cardiology centres in Sweden from 1990 to 2012.

RESULTS: Of the 153 cases, 28% had atrial flutter (AF), 63% had atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) and 9% had other mechanisms. Hydrops was present in 45, less frequently in AF than in AVRT. Transplacental treatment was commenced in 99 and the rhythm normalised in two-thirds, without any significant difference in cardioversion rates between AF and AVRT cases or nonhydropic and hydropic foetuses. Sotalol treatment had a higher cardioversion rate than digoxin in AVRT (63% versus 33%, p < 0.05) but not in AF (57% versus 56%). Two or more drugs were used in 38%. Neonatal survival was 100% in nonhydropic and 84% in hydropic cases. After a median of eight years, 11/134 patients still had arrhythmias, one had died due to arrhythmia and another had undergone cardiac transplantation.

CONCLUSION: Transplacental treatment was frequently insufficient to obtain cardioversion in nonhydropic and hydropic foetuses, but all nonhydropic cases had favourable outcomes. Larger prospective studies are needed to optimise the treatment of cases with hydrops.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app