We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Discharge prescriptions following admission for acute myocardial infarction at tertiary care and community hospitals in Quebec.
Canadian Journal of Cardiology 2001 January
BACKGROUND: Many physicians are not adhering to the recommendations found in evidence-based guidelines for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Physicians who practise in tertiary care settings may show better adherence to guideline recommendations than physicians who practise in other settings.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is an association between the practice setting of admission for AMI and discharge prescriptions for cardiac drugs recommended in evidence-based guidelines.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Discharge prescription data from a prospective cohort of patients with AMI admitted at five tertiary care (n=250) and five community hospitals (n=331) in Quebec from December 1996 to November 1998 were examined.
RESULTS: The proportions of patients who were prescribed recommended drugs at tertiary care hospitals compared with those at community hospitals were as follows: beta-blockers (78% versus 74%, respectively; 95% CI around the difference - 4% to 11%), lipid-lowering drugs (45% versus 39%, respectively; 95% CI - 2% to 15%) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (44% versus 57%, respectively; 95% CI - 22% to - 5%). In adjusted analyses, practice setting was not associated with the prescription of beta-blockers (odds ratio [OR] for tertiary care 1.36; 95% CI 0.82 to 2.24) or lipid-lowering drugs (OR for tertiary care 1.06; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.68). However, tertiary care admission reduced the likelihood of ACE inhibitor prescription (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.77). This association may have been due to the increased likelihood of ACE inhibitor prescription for patients with hypertension at community hospitals (OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.23 to 3.67). The results also showed that older patients were less likely to be prescribed beta-blockers or lipid-lowering drugs, women were less likely to be prescribed beta-blockers and patients with diabetes mellitus were less likely to be prescribed lipid-lowering drugs (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.89).
CONCLUSION: No strong association was found between the practice setting of admission for AMI and discharge prescriptions for cardiac drugs recommended in evidence-based guidelines. Prescription rates for recommended drugs were high, yet results suggest that there is room for improvement with regard to patients with diabetes, women and older patients.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is an association between the practice setting of admission for AMI and discharge prescriptions for cardiac drugs recommended in evidence-based guidelines.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Discharge prescription data from a prospective cohort of patients with AMI admitted at five tertiary care (n=250) and five community hospitals (n=331) in Quebec from December 1996 to November 1998 were examined.
RESULTS: The proportions of patients who were prescribed recommended drugs at tertiary care hospitals compared with those at community hospitals were as follows: beta-blockers (78% versus 74%, respectively; 95% CI around the difference - 4% to 11%), lipid-lowering drugs (45% versus 39%, respectively; 95% CI - 2% to 15%) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (44% versus 57%, respectively; 95% CI - 22% to - 5%). In adjusted analyses, practice setting was not associated with the prescription of beta-blockers (odds ratio [OR] for tertiary care 1.36; 95% CI 0.82 to 2.24) or lipid-lowering drugs (OR for tertiary care 1.06; 95% CI 0.67 to 1.68). However, tertiary care admission reduced the likelihood of ACE inhibitor prescription (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.77). This association may have been due to the increased likelihood of ACE inhibitor prescription for patients with hypertension at community hospitals (OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.23 to 3.67). The results also showed that older patients were less likely to be prescribed beta-blockers or lipid-lowering drugs, women were less likely to be prescribed beta-blockers and patients with diabetes mellitus were less likely to be prescribed lipid-lowering drugs (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.89).
CONCLUSION: No strong association was found between the practice setting of admission for AMI and discharge prescriptions for cardiac drugs recommended in evidence-based guidelines. Prescription rates for recommended drugs were high, yet results suggest that there is room for improvement with regard to patients with diabetes, women and older patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app