We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Review
Umbilical artery catheters in the newborn: effects of position of the catheter tip.
BACKGROUND: This section is under preparation and will be included in the next issue.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the position of the tip of an umbilical arterial catheter influences the frequency of ischemic events, aortic thrombosis, intraventricular hemorrhage, mortality or necrotising enterocolitis in newborn infants.
SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomized and quasi randomized controlled trials of umbilical catheterization use were obtained from the following sources: 1. Effective Care of the Newborn Infant, edited by JC Sinclair and MB Bracken. 2. Medline Search using Melvyl Medline Plus and the keyword headings 'Umbilic#', 'Catheter#' and subject heading 'Infant, Newborn' 3. Search of personal data files
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials in newborn infants of any birthweight or gestation. Comparison of high catheter placement with the tip above the diaphragm to a lower position just above the aortic bifurcation. Clinically important end points such as ischemic events or aortic thrombosis.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Five randomized controlled trials and one alternate assignment study had sufficiently detailed data to allow interpretation.
MAIN RESULTS: High placed umbilical artery catheters are associated with a lower incidence of clinical vascular complications, without an increase in any adverse sequelae. Intraventricular hemorrhage rates, death and necrotising enterocolitis are not more frequent with high compared to low catheters.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be no evidence to support the use of low placed umbilical artery catheters. High catheters should be used exclusively.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the position of the tip of an umbilical arterial catheter influences the frequency of ischemic events, aortic thrombosis, intraventricular hemorrhage, mortality or necrotising enterocolitis in newborn infants.
SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomized and quasi randomized controlled trials of umbilical catheterization use were obtained from the following sources: 1. Effective Care of the Newborn Infant, edited by JC Sinclair and MB Bracken. 2. Medline Search using Melvyl Medline Plus and the keyword headings 'Umbilic#', 'Catheter#' and subject heading 'Infant, Newborn' 3. Search of personal data files
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trials in newborn infants of any birthweight or gestation. Comparison of high catheter placement with the tip above the diaphragm to a lower position just above the aortic bifurcation. Clinically important end points such as ischemic events or aortic thrombosis.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Five randomized controlled trials and one alternate assignment study had sufficiently detailed data to allow interpretation.
MAIN RESULTS: High placed umbilical artery catheters are associated with a lower incidence of clinical vascular complications, without an increase in any adverse sequelae. Intraventricular hemorrhage rates, death and necrotising enterocolitis are not more frequent with high compared to low catheters.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be no evidence to support the use of low placed umbilical artery catheters. High catheters should be used exclusively.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of adult and juvenile onset Sjögren disease.Rheumatology 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app