We have located links that may give you full text access.
The preparticipation physical examination history: who has the correct answers?
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine 1999 July
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether discrepancies exist between information given by parents and student athletes during the annual preparticipation physical examination (PPE) for athletics, and if present, whether the discrepancies occurred in areas of clinical significance to sports medicine and clearance for participation.
DESIGN: Survey.
SETTING: Station-based PPEs for area high school student athletes were performed using the form developed by the Preparticipation Physical Evaluation Task Force (PPETF).
PARTICIPANTS: High school student athletes and their parents or guardians.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The discrepancy rate (and associated clinical areas of those discrepancies) for information given by parent-student pairs completing a standard historical section of a PPE.
RESULTS: Of the high school student athletes who participated in the station-based PPE, 111 (34%) participated in this study. These student athletes completed the PPE form (14 sections with a total of 38 specific questions) independently during an initial session, and then were given an identical PPE form that was completed with the assistance of a parent or legal guardian. Of the 111 parent-student pairs, only 22 (19.8%) histories were in complete agreement. Several questions had very poor agreement, as indicated by a kappa value < or = 0.4. Taken together, 4 of the 14 historical information sections found on the PPE (cardiovascular, neurologic, musculoskeletal, and questions pertaining to weight) accounted for 59% of all discrepancies. Answers to individual questions did not differ significantly between parents and students when analyzed together and then by gender and age. Interestingly, students answered significantly more questions in an affirmative manner than did their parents.
CONCLUSION: Using the form developed by the PPETF, parents and student athletes may not provide reliable historical information on which to base participation decisions. In particular, unreliable information may be obtained regarding cardiovascular and musculoskeletal issues, areas that are related to the mortality and morbidity associated with athletic activity.
DESIGN: Survey.
SETTING: Station-based PPEs for area high school student athletes were performed using the form developed by the Preparticipation Physical Evaluation Task Force (PPETF).
PARTICIPANTS: High school student athletes and their parents or guardians.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The discrepancy rate (and associated clinical areas of those discrepancies) for information given by parent-student pairs completing a standard historical section of a PPE.
RESULTS: Of the high school student athletes who participated in the station-based PPE, 111 (34%) participated in this study. These student athletes completed the PPE form (14 sections with a total of 38 specific questions) independently during an initial session, and then were given an identical PPE form that was completed with the assistance of a parent or legal guardian. Of the 111 parent-student pairs, only 22 (19.8%) histories were in complete agreement. Several questions had very poor agreement, as indicated by a kappa value < or = 0.4. Taken together, 4 of the 14 historical information sections found on the PPE (cardiovascular, neurologic, musculoskeletal, and questions pertaining to weight) accounted for 59% of all discrepancies. Answers to individual questions did not differ significantly between parents and students when analyzed together and then by gender and age. Interestingly, students answered significantly more questions in an affirmative manner than did their parents.
CONCLUSION: Using the form developed by the PPETF, parents and student athletes may not provide reliable historical information on which to base participation decisions. In particular, unreliable information may be obtained regarding cardiovascular and musculoskeletal issues, areas that are related to the mortality and morbidity associated with athletic activity.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app