Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Analysis of cystic intracranial lesions performed with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR imaging.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: T1-, T2-, and proton density (PD)-weighted sequences are used to characterize the content of cystic intracranial lesions. Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MR sequences produce T2-weighted images with water signal saturation. Therefore, we attempted to verify whether FLAIR, as compared with conventional techniques, improves the distinction between intracranial cysts with a free water-like content versus those filled with a non-free water-like substance and, consequently, aids in the identification of these lesions as either neoplastic/inflammatory or maldevelopmental/porencephalic.

METHODS: Forty-five cystic intracranial lesions were studied using T1-weighted, T2-weighted, FLAIR, and PD-weighted sequences. By means of clustering analysis of the ratio in signal intensity between the cystic intracranial lesions and CSF, the intracranial lesions were classified as filled with a free water-like content or with a non-free water-like substance. The results were compared with their true content as evaluated either histologically or on the basis of clinical, neuroradiologic, and follow-up features (necrotic material, 13 cases; accumulation of intercellular proteinaceous/myxoid material, eight cases; keratin, five cases; CSF, 19 cases). Cystic intracranial lesions were divided into two clinical groups, neoplastic/inflammatory and maldevelopmental/porencephalic, to evaluate the level of accuracy of each MR technique. The difference in absolute value signal intensity between CSF and cystic intracranial lesion content was calculated on FLAIR and PD-weighted images.

RESULTS: PD-weighted and FLAIR sequences, unlike T1- and T2-weighted sequences, accurately depicted all cystic intracranial lesions containing necrotic or myxoid/proteinaceous intercellular material (non-free water-like) and most CSF-containing cystic intracranial lesions (free water-like). All imaging techniques inaccurately showed some of the keratin-containing cystic intracranial lesions and pineal cysts. The overall error rate was 22% for T1-weighted, 27% for T2-weighted, 9% for FLAIR, and 13% for PD-weighted sequences. The signal intensity difference between CSF and cystic intracranial lesion content was higher with FLAIR imaging.

CONCLUSIONS: FLAIR imaging depicts far more accurately the content of cystic intracranial lesions and better reveals the distinction between maldevelopmental/porencephalic and neoplastic/inflammatory lesions than do conventional sequences. FLAIR has the added advantage of a higher signal intensity difference between cystic intracranial lesions and CSF.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app