[Diagnoses of thyroid disorders in ENT and general practices in Germany between 2008 and 2016].

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate thyroid disorder diagnoses in otorhinolaryngologic (ENT) practices in Germany compared to general (GP) practices using data from a representative Germany-wide practice database.

METHODS: The database was retrospectively searched for diagnoses of thyroid disorders made in ENT and GP practices between January 2008 and December 2016. Data were collected on the most common three-character disease classes (categories) from the "Disorders of thyroid gland" (E00-E07) group as well as the "Benign neoplasm of thyroid gland" (D34) and "Malignant neoplasm of thyroid gland" (C73) categories. The periods 2008-2010, 2011-2013, and 2014-2016 were evaluated.

RESULTS: The database included 71 ENT and 506 GP practices with continuous participation from 2008 to 2016. The relative frequency (patients/practice) of diagnoses from the "Disorders of thyroid gland" group was 4.4-times higher in GP than in ENT practices. The relative frequency of benign neoplasms of the thyroid gland was 5‑times higher in GP than in ENT practices. The relative frequency of malignant neoplasms of the thyroid gland was almost identical in GP and ENT practices. The most frequent diagnoses in both ENT and GP practices were found in the categories "Other nontoxic goiter" (E04) and "Other hypothyroidism" (E03). Diagnoses in the categories "Hyperthyroidism" (E05) and "Thyroiditis" (E06) were less frequent. Diagnoses of thyroid neoplasms were the least frequent, with benign neoplasms diagnosed more frequently in GP practices and malignant neoplasms diagnosed more frequently in ENT practices. During the study period, the diagnostic frequency of thyroid diseases decreased in ENT practices, whereas it increased in GP practices.

CONCLUSION: Despite the increasing interest in establishing thyroid surgery in ENT clinics in Germany in recent years, thyroid diagnoses in ENT practices in Germany have been continuously declining, whereas they have considerably increased in GP practices. The reason for this may be health insurance provider-related differences in reimbursement practices for GPs and specialists.