We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Fertility Treatment Outcomes After Follicle Tracking With Standard 2-Dimensional Sonography Versus 3-Dimensional Sonography-Based Automated Volume Count: Prospective Study.
OBJECTIVES: The use of sonography-based Automated Volume Count (SonoAVC; GE Healthcare, Kretz, Zipf, Austria) leads to substantially lower intraobserver and interobserver variability with a considerable advantage in time gain for both the physician and patient. It offers the possibility of continuous training and standardization of follicular monitoring. Manual and automated follicular measurements during in vitro fertilization (IVF) are reported to be comparable during gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of follicle tracking with 3-dimensional (3D) SonoAVC on treatment outcomes in GnRH antagonist IVF cycles.
METHODS: A prospective trial included 54 women undergoing their first to fourth GnRH antagonist IVF cycles. Follicle tracking from the initiation of ovarian stimulation until the day of oocyte retrieval and timing of oocyte retrieval was done either by conventional 2-dimensional (2D) sonography or 3D SonoAVC (open-labeled parallel assignment). In both groups, recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin was injected when there were at least 3 leading follicles measuring 17 mm. The primary outcome was the oocyte maturation rate, and secondary outcomes were the fertilization rate and clinical pregnancy rate.
RESULTS: The number of retrieved oocytes, number and rate of mature oocytes, fertilization rate, and clinical pregnancy rate were similar for 2D sonography and 3D SonoAVC. On a multivariate regression analysis, the use of 3D sonography was not a significant independent predictor of mature oocytes or clinical pregnancy rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Follicle tracking with 3D sonographic follicular volume measurements does not achieve better fertility outcomes than standard 2D sonography.
METHODS: A prospective trial included 54 women undergoing their first to fourth GnRH antagonist IVF cycles. Follicle tracking from the initiation of ovarian stimulation until the day of oocyte retrieval and timing of oocyte retrieval was done either by conventional 2-dimensional (2D) sonography or 3D SonoAVC (open-labeled parallel assignment). In both groups, recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin was injected when there were at least 3 leading follicles measuring 17 mm. The primary outcome was the oocyte maturation rate, and secondary outcomes were the fertilization rate and clinical pregnancy rate.
RESULTS: The number of retrieved oocytes, number and rate of mature oocytes, fertilization rate, and clinical pregnancy rate were similar for 2D sonography and 3D SonoAVC. On a multivariate regression analysis, the use of 3D sonography was not a significant independent predictor of mature oocytes or clinical pregnancy rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Follicle tracking with 3D sonographic follicular volume measurements does not achieve better fertility outcomes than standard 2D sonography.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
A Systematic Review of Subclinical Hyperthyroidism Guidelines: a Remarkable Range of Recommendations.European Thyroid Journal 2024 May 2
Nutrition in the intensive care unit: from the acute phase to beyond.Intensive Care Medicine 2024 May 22
The Therapy and Management of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: New Insights on Treatment.Cardiac Failure Review 2024
Sodium-glucose co-transporter protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes.Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2024 May 22
Bronchiectasis management in adults: state of the art and future directions.European Respiratory Journal 2024 May 24
Pathophysiological Link and Treatment Implication of Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.Biomedicines 2024 April 31
2024 update in heart failure.ESC Heart Failure 2024 May 29
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app