We have located links that may give you full text access.
The second fat graft has significantly better outcome than the first fat graft for Romberg syndrome: A study of three-dimensional volumetric analysis.
BACKGROUND: Patients with congenital or acquired deformities always need fat graft at least twice to remodel facial contour. The purpose of this study was to objectively evaluate the outcomes of the first and second fat grafts for Romberg syndrome by using three-dimensional (3D) volumetric analysis.
METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted using the medical records of 13 patients with Romberg disease who were treated with fat graft twice for facial filling. Patient and surgeon satisfactions were evaluated by comparing the preoperative and postoperative two-dimensional (2D) photographs. The preoperative and postoperative 3D images were analyzed with professional analysis software to calculate the volume discrepancy between them.
RESULT: According to the 2D photographs, both patients and the surgeon were more satisfied with the cosmetic results of the second fat graft. There was no significant statistical difference in the injection volumes between the two surgeries (p = 0.1); however, the survival rate of the second fat graft (75.1% ± 7.7%) was much higher than that of the first (43.3% ± 11.1%) with a significant difference (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: In this study, 3D images were used to objectively evaluate the survival rate of fat graft. The results showed that the second fat graft without any sophisticated procedures could acquire better cosmetic result and volume retention in Romberg syndrome. This study result could serve as a guide for clinical surgeons to forecast the outcome of sequential fat graft for patients with congenital or acquired deformities.
METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted using the medical records of 13 patients with Romberg disease who were treated with fat graft twice for facial filling. Patient and surgeon satisfactions were evaluated by comparing the preoperative and postoperative two-dimensional (2D) photographs. The preoperative and postoperative 3D images were analyzed with professional analysis software to calculate the volume discrepancy between them.
RESULT: According to the 2D photographs, both patients and the surgeon were more satisfied with the cosmetic results of the second fat graft. There was no significant statistical difference in the injection volumes between the two surgeries (p = 0.1); however, the survival rate of the second fat graft (75.1% ± 7.7%) was much higher than that of the first (43.3% ± 11.1%) with a significant difference (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: In this study, 3D images were used to objectively evaluate the survival rate of fat graft. The results showed that the second fat graft without any sophisticated procedures could acquire better cosmetic result and volume retention in Romberg syndrome. This study result could serve as a guide for clinical surgeons to forecast the outcome of sequential fat graft for patients with congenital or acquired deformities.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
A Systematic Review of Subclinical Hyperthyroidism Guidelines: a Remarkable Range of Recommendations.European Thyroid Journal 2024 May 2
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
Contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a review of definition, pathogenesis, risk factors, prevention and treatment.BMC Nephrology 2024 April 23
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Diabetes and Renal Complications: An Overview on Pathophysiology, Biomarkers and Therapeutic Interventions.Biomedicines 2024 May 16
Joint ERS/EACTS/ESTS clinical practice guidelines on adults with spontaneous pneumothorax.European Respiratory Journal 2024 May
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app