We have located links that may give you full text access.
Primary anastomosis and diverting colostomy in diffuse diverticular peritonitis.
Acta Chirurgica Belgica 2002 Februrary
BACKGROUND: Despite the well documented morbidity associated with its reversal, Hartmann's procedure remains the favoured option in patients with complicated diverticular disease in the presence of diffuse peritonitis. A prospective study was conducted to determine whether primary anastomosis with diverting colostomy constitutes a valid alternative to the Hartmann procedure.
METHODS: Between 1994 and 1998, all patients with diffuse peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis of sigmoid origin underwent resection and primary anastomosis with diverting colostomy. Restoration of colonic continuity was programmed six weeks later, after verification of the anastomose by gastrografin enema. The group included 5 men and 15 women with a mean age of 72 years (32-97 years). The ASA classification of the patients was as follows: ASA II (n = 2), ASA III (n = 12), ASA IV (n = 3), ASA V (n = 3). The mean delay between onset of symptoms and surgery was 74 hours (8-215 hours).
RESULTS: Operative mortality and morbidity was 15% (n = 3) and 50% respectively. No patients showed signs of suture disruption and this was confirmed by routine radiological controls of the anastomoses. Mean length of hospitalization was 20 +/- 10 days (SD; median: 18 days). Closure of the colostomy using a small peristomal incision was performed in all surviving patients after a mean delay of 45 +/- 9 days (range 28-67 days). Mean length of hospitalization for colostomy closure was 7 +/- 3 days (range 3-18 days) without mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Applied systematically to all patients with diffuse peritonitis due to perforated diverticular disease, primary anastomosis was found to be as safe as the Hartmann procedure but appears to be superior in terms of total length of hospital stay, interval to stoma closure and rates of stoma closure. Primary anastomosis with diverting colostomy could constitute a valid alternative to the Hartmann procedure in selected patients with complicated diverticular disease, even in the presence of diffuse peritonitis.
METHODS: Between 1994 and 1998, all patients with diffuse peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis of sigmoid origin underwent resection and primary anastomosis with diverting colostomy. Restoration of colonic continuity was programmed six weeks later, after verification of the anastomose by gastrografin enema. The group included 5 men and 15 women with a mean age of 72 years (32-97 years). The ASA classification of the patients was as follows: ASA II (n = 2), ASA III (n = 12), ASA IV (n = 3), ASA V (n = 3). The mean delay between onset of symptoms and surgery was 74 hours (8-215 hours).
RESULTS: Operative mortality and morbidity was 15% (n = 3) and 50% respectively. No patients showed signs of suture disruption and this was confirmed by routine radiological controls of the anastomoses. Mean length of hospitalization was 20 +/- 10 days (SD; median: 18 days). Closure of the colostomy using a small peristomal incision was performed in all surviving patients after a mean delay of 45 +/- 9 days (range 28-67 days). Mean length of hospitalization for colostomy closure was 7 +/- 3 days (range 3-18 days) without mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Applied systematically to all patients with diffuse peritonitis due to perforated diverticular disease, primary anastomosis was found to be as safe as the Hartmann procedure but appears to be superior in terms of total length of hospital stay, interval to stoma closure and rates of stoma closure. Primary anastomosis with diverting colostomy could constitute a valid alternative to the Hartmann procedure in selected patients with complicated diverticular disease, even in the presence of diffuse peritonitis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Prevention and treatment of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke in people with diabetes mellitus: a focus on glucose control and comorbidities.Diabetologia 2024 April 17
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical Pearls for Primary Care Providers and Gastroenterologists.Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2024 April
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app