Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Intrapartum oligohydramnios does not predict adverse peripartum outcome among high-risk parturients.

OBJECTIVE: Oligohydramnios can be defined by an amniotic fluid index < 5th percentile for gestational age or an amniotic fluid index < or = 5.0 cm regardless of gestational age. The purpose of this prospective study was to determine whether oligohydramnios by either definition predicts accurately, in a high-risk population, the risks for cesarean section for fetal distress, Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes, and neonatal acidosis.

STUDY DESIGN: An amniotic fluid index was obtained in 490 consecutive parturients with medical or obstetric complications and a reliable gestational age. After each delivery, an umbilical arterial blood gas analysis was obtained. Both measures of amniotic fluid index were rated as screening tests with use of sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and receiver-operator characteristic curves.

RESULTS: The incidences of cesarean section for fetal distress and umbilical arterial pH < 7.00 were 14% and 1.8%, respectively. The 70 neonates delivered by cesarean section for distress, compared with the 420 without, had a significantly higher incidence of pH < 7.00 (8.5% vs 0.7%, p = 0.0004, relative risk 5.0, 95% confidence interval 2.9 to 8.4). Sensitivity and positive predictive values of an amniotic fluid index < 5th percentile for gestational age to predict pH < 7.00 were 0.8% and 22%, respectively, and for an amniotic fluid index < or = 5.0 cm, 0.5% and 11%, respectively. Receiver-operator characteristic curves indicate that an amniotic fluid index between 0 and 20 cm cannot predict accurately which parturients will have cesarean sections for distress or be delivered of a newborn with a low Apgar score at 5 minutes or a pH < 7.10.

CONCLUSION: Both criteria for oligohydramnios are poor predictors of adverse outcome for high-risk intrapartum patients.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app