Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) compared with standard CPR in a manikin model--decompression force, compression rate, depth and duration.

Resuscitation 1997 Februrary
During active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR), the rescuer applies traction to the chest between compressions. Under experimental conditions, cardiac output increases, possibly through accentuated intrathoracal pressure fluctuations. ACD-CPR requires specific training and may be more complex to perform than standard CPR. The aim of this study was to characterize ACD-CPR performance compared with standard CPR by emergency care providers; in terms of decompression force, compression rate, depth and duration. Thirty-three ambulance paramedics were studied while performing standard CPR and ACD-CPR with the Ambu Cardiopump on a specially designed transducer-equipped manikin 9 months following initial training. The order of CPR performance was determined randomly by cross-over design. Performance data were recorded by a computer. The 2-min average active decompression force was 9.3 kg (interquartile range 2.5-15.3 kg) and six subjects (18%) met the manufacturers recommendation of 10-15 kg. External chest compression (ECC) rate decreased from 85 (70-101) to 76 (63-88) min-1 (P < 0.001), ECC depth decreased from 54 (50-58) to 45 (39-48) mm (P < 0.001) and compression duration from 40 (35-45) to 31% (28-33%) (P < 0.001) upon change from standard CPR to ACD-CPR. We conclude that the recommended level of decompression force was achieved by less than one fifth of study subjects. ACD-CPR when compared with standard CPR causes a consistent and significant reduction of compression rate, depth and duration. These are all factors of possible clinical significance. Training in ACD-CPR should address this issue, with special emphasis on optimal decompression force and ECC rate.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app