We have located links that may give you full text access.
Evaluation of different criteria for the separation of pleural transudates from exudates.
Chest 1993 August
OBJECTIVES: To determine the relative usefulness of different criteria for the separation of pleural transudates from exudates.
DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of patients referred for thoracentesis.
SETTING: Community teaching hospital.
PATIENTS: Three hundred fifty-one consecutive patients with pleural effusions referred for thoracentesis. Fifty-four of these patients were excluded from the analysis.
MEASUREMENTS: We recorded clinical characteristics and final diagnosis and measured pleural fluid and serum levels of total protein, lactate dehydrogenase, and cholesterol. All patients included were followed up until final diagnosis. MEAN RESULTS: Forty-four (15 percent) pleural effusions were transudates and 253 (85 percent) were exudates. The criteria of Light et al, with a sensitivity of 98 percent and a specificity of 77 percent for exudates, showed the best accuracy (95.2 percent). Moreover, when the cutoff used for the criteria of Light et al was modified according to our own laboratory results, specificity rose to 93 percent with almost a similar accuracy (94 percent). Protein pleural fluid/serum ratio > 0.5 and pleural fluid cholesterol > 60 mg/dl showed equal specificity (91 percent), but the former had better sensitivity for exudates (88 percent vs 81 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: When the proportion of exudates included is 85 percent or more, as in the present series, the criteria of Light et al remain the method that offers the highest accuracy for segregating transudates from exudates.
DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of patients referred for thoracentesis.
SETTING: Community teaching hospital.
PATIENTS: Three hundred fifty-one consecutive patients with pleural effusions referred for thoracentesis. Fifty-four of these patients were excluded from the analysis.
MEASUREMENTS: We recorded clinical characteristics and final diagnosis and measured pleural fluid and serum levels of total protein, lactate dehydrogenase, and cholesterol. All patients included were followed up until final diagnosis. MEAN RESULTS: Forty-four (15 percent) pleural effusions were transudates and 253 (85 percent) were exudates. The criteria of Light et al, with a sensitivity of 98 percent and a specificity of 77 percent for exudates, showed the best accuracy (95.2 percent). Moreover, when the cutoff used for the criteria of Light et al was modified according to our own laboratory results, specificity rose to 93 percent with almost a similar accuracy (94 percent). Protein pleural fluid/serum ratio > 0.5 and pleural fluid cholesterol > 60 mg/dl showed equal specificity (91 percent), but the former had better sensitivity for exudates (88 percent vs 81 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: When the proportion of exudates included is 85 percent or more, as in the present series, the criteria of Light et al remain the method that offers the highest accuracy for segregating transudates from exudates.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app