Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Chemical characterization and source apportionment of PM 2.5 in a Northeastern China city during the epidemic period.

To investigate the influence of COVID-19 lockdown measures on PM2.5 and its chemical components in Shenyang, PM2.5 samples were continuously collected from January 1 to May 31, 2020. The samples were then analyzed for water-soluble inorganic ions, metal elements, organic carbon, and elemental carbon. The findings indicated a significant decrease in PM2.5 and its various chemical components during the lockdown period, compared to pre-lockdown levels (p < 0.05), suggesting a substantial improvement in air quality. Water-soluble inorganic ions (WSIIs) were identified as the primary contributors to PM2.5 , accounting for 47% before the lockdown, 46% during the lockdown, and 37% after the lockdown. Ionic balance analysis revealed that PM2.5 exhibited neutral, weakly alkaline, and alkaline characteristics before, during, and after the lockdown, respectively. NH4 + was identified as the main balancing cation and was predominantly present in the form of NH4 NO3 in the absence of complete neutralization of SO4 2- and NO3 - . Moreover, the higher sulfur oxidation ratio (SOR) and nitrogen oxidation ratio (NOR), along with the significant increase in PM2.5 /EC, suggested intense secondary transformation during the lockdown period. The elevated OC/EC ratio during the lockdown period implied higher secondary organic carbon (SOC), and the notable increase in SOC/EC ratio indicated a significant secondary transformation of total carbon. The enrichment factor (EF) results revealed that during the lockdown, 9 metal elements (As, Sn, Pb, Zn, Cu, Sb, Ag, Cd, and Se) were substantially impacted by anthropogenic emissions. Source analysis of PMF was employed to identify the sources of PM2.5 in Shenyang during the study period, and the analysis identified six factors: secondary sulfate and vehicle emissions, catering fume sources, secondary nitrate and coal combustion emissions, dust sources, biomass combustion, and industrial emissions, with secondary sulfate and vehicle emissions and catering fume sources contributing the most to PM2.5 .

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app