Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Redefining the molecular rejection states in 3230 heart transplant biopsies: relationships to parenchymal injury and graft survival.

The first-generation Molecular Microscope® (MMDx) system for heart transplant endomyocardial biopsies used expression of rejection-associated transcripts (RATs) to diagnose T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) and antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) but also detected acute injury. However, the ideal system should detect rejection without being influenced by injury, to permit analysis of the relationship between rejection and parenchymal injury. To achieve this, we developed a new rejection classification in an expanded cohort of 3230 biopsies: 1641 from INTERHEART (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02670408), plus 1589 service biopsies added to improve the power of the machine learning algorithms. The new system used six rejection classifiers instead of RATs and generated seven rejection archetypes: No Rejection 48%; Minor 24%; TCMR1 2.3%; TCMR2 2.7%; TCMR/Mixed 2.7%; EABMR 3.9%; and FABMR 16%. Using rejection classifiers eliminated cross-reactions with acute injury, permitting separate assessment of rejection and injury. TCMR was associated with severe recent injury and late atrophy-fibrosis and rarely had normal parenchyma. ABMR was better tolerated, seldom producing severe injury, but in later biopsies was often associated with atrophy-fibrosis, indicating long term risk. Graft survival and LVEF were reduced in hearts with TCMR, but also in hearts with severe-recent injury and atrophy-fibrosis, even without rejection. INTERHEART: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02670408.

Full text links

We have located open access text paper links.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app