We have located links that may give you full text access.
Does metabolic syndrome increase contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with normal renal function?
BACKGROUND: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention. This study aimed to compare the incidence of CIN in two groups of patients with and without metabolic syndrome (Mets) with baseline normal renal function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this case - control study, 260 patient candidates for CAG, 130 patients with Mets and 130 patients without Mets participated, and their serum creatinine (Cr) level before and the 48 and 72 h after the angiography was measured. The incidence of CIN was compared in two groups. Two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures and univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.
RESULTS: The results showed a higher chance of being Mets with raising in triglyceride (adjusted odds ratio = 1.05, 95% confidence interval = (1.03-1.06), P < 0.001), Fasting blood glucose (1.010 [1.001-1.019], P = 0.025), and diastolic blood pressure (1.07 [1.07-1.20], P < 0.001), but declining in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) (0.91 [0.85-0.98], P = 0.008). Furthermore, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and Cr level was raised in 48 and 72 h after contrast injection in both groups (All P < 0.001). Furthermore, in 48 h (3.11 [1.12-9.93], P = 0.016) and 72 h (2.82 [1.07-8.28], P = 0.021) after injection, a total of 25 patients had an increased Cr level and a significant difference between Mets and without Mets groups. The developing Mets had a significant association with the increased risk of AKI, which increased the chance of developing nephropathy (7.14 [2.27-22.5], P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Mets, together with other risk factors, increased the overall risk of CIN development. Therefore, the incidence of CIN in patients Mets is significantly higher than that of patients without Mets, indicating a more important CIN risk factor.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this case - control study, 260 patient candidates for CAG, 130 patients with Mets and 130 patients without Mets participated, and their serum creatinine (Cr) level before and the 48 and 72 h after the angiography was measured. The incidence of CIN was compared in two groups. Two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures and univariate and multivariate logistic regression models.
RESULTS: The results showed a higher chance of being Mets with raising in triglyceride (adjusted odds ratio = 1.05, 95% confidence interval = (1.03-1.06), P < 0.001), Fasting blood glucose (1.010 [1.001-1.019], P = 0.025), and diastolic blood pressure (1.07 [1.07-1.20], P < 0.001), but declining in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) (0.91 [0.85-0.98], P = 0.008). Furthermore, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and Cr level was raised in 48 and 72 h after contrast injection in both groups (All P < 0.001). Furthermore, in 48 h (3.11 [1.12-9.93], P = 0.016) and 72 h (2.82 [1.07-8.28], P = 0.021) after injection, a total of 25 patients had an increased Cr level and a significant difference between Mets and without Mets groups. The developing Mets had a significant association with the increased risk of AKI, which increased the chance of developing nephropathy (7.14 [2.27-22.5], P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Mets, together with other risk factors, increased the overall risk of CIN development. Therefore, the incidence of CIN in patients Mets is significantly higher than that of patients without Mets, indicating a more important CIN risk factor.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app