We have located links that may give you full text access.
In vivo assessment of antimicrobial activity and toxicity of repeated 1% povidone-iodine applications versus a single 5% povidone-iodine application.
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2024 Februrary 29
PURPOSE: To demonstrate the non-inferiority in antimicrobial effectiveness of thrice-repeated applications of 1% povidone-iodine (PI) compared to a single application of 5% PI on the ocular surface in vivo and to evaluate potential toxicity of PI to the corneal epithelium.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized, double-blind study.
METHODS: Patients randomly received either a single application of 5% PI or repeated irrigations of 1% PI on the ocular surface before surgery. Bacterial colony counts were quantitatively analyzed by taking standardized conjunctival swabs before and after irrigation, and differences in bacterial colony counts were compared between the 2 groups. The presence of superficial punctate keratopathy was evaluated in all patients by the National Eye Institute grading system.
RESULTS: The study comprised 102 eyes of 102 patients. Both 1% and 5% PI yielded a marked decrease in bacterial colonies compared to pre-application (P<.001). The repeated application of 1% PI showed a significantly lower bacterial count compared to the single application of 5% PI (P<.05) and resulted in significantly less damage to the corneal epithelium compared to a single 5% PI application (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative repeated applications of 1% PI effectively eradicated ocular surface bacteria equal to that of 5% PI with less deleterious impact on the corneal epithelium. Our findings suggest that 1% PI may be a promising alternative to 5% PI.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized, double-blind study.
METHODS: Patients randomly received either a single application of 5% PI or repeated irrigations of 1% PI on the ocular surface before surgery. Bacterial colony counts were quantitatively analyzed by taking standardized conjunctival swabs before and after irrigation, and differences in bacterial colony counts were compared between the 2 groups. The presence of superficial punctate keratopathy was evaluated in all patients by the National Eye Institute grading system.
RESULTS: The study comprised 102 eyes of 102 patients. Both 1% and 5% PI yielded a marked decrease in bacterial colonies compared to pre-application (P<.001). The repeated application of 1% PI showed a significantly lower bacterial count compared to the single application of 5% PI (P<.05) and resulted in significantly less damage to the corneal epithelium compared to a single 5% PI application (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative repeated applications of 1% PI effectively eradicated ocular surface bacteria equal to that of 5% PI with less deleterious impact on the corneal epithelium. Our findings suggest that 1% PI may be a promising alternative to 5% PI.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Management of Diverticulitis: A Review.JAMA Surgery 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app