Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Case study and pilot results: Stepwise approach to teach a resident tube shunt surgery.

PURPOSE: To illustrate the utility of a previously published stepwise rubric for evaluating a resident's progress learning aqueous tube shunt surgery.

METHOD: Using a stepwise rubric, a single PGY3 ophthalmology resident and attending glaucoma surgeon evaluated the resident's performance after each aqueous tube shunt surgery. The rubric subdivides the surgery into 12 consecutive steps and scores the resident's proficiency in each step with either a 0 (observation), 2 (novice), 3 (beginner), 4 (advanced beginner), or 5 (competent).

RESULTS: The resident's cumulative score increased significantly throughout the 17 surgeries performed, with the resident's self-evaluated score and attending's score increasing from 12 to 27 and 14 to 27 from the first to last surgery, respectively. Scores were consistent between the resident and attending; for any given surgery, the resident's own score never deviated from the attending's score by more than 1 point. The resident completed at least 50% of the steps in 11 of the 17 cases. While some surgical steps were mastered earlier on ("tube tying" and "suture implantation"), other steps were more challenging to master ("tunnel in sclera and enter the AC" and "close conjunctiva", as demonstrated by fewer overall attempts or never attaining a score of '5' despite multiple attempts.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: This study demonstrates the utility of the stepwise rubric in tracking resident surgical scores chronologically via self and attending assessment. The ability to compare their own scores to that of an attending allows the resident to learn how to effectively evaluate their own performance. Most importantly, statistics obtained for each step provides the resident with personalized and real-time feedback for learning specific surgical steps. In conclusion, the stepwise rubric is a useful add-on to a resident's aqueous tube shunt surgery education.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app