The use of thyroid isthmusectomy for management of well differentiated thyroid carcinoma - A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: With the growing global incidence of thyroid carcinomas, there is an increasing need for distinct guidelines for isthmus-confined carcinomas. Here, we performed the first systematic review on the topic to date, aiming to provide understanding to isthmusectomy as surgical management for well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma of the isthmus.

METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines, analyzing English-language studies from the past decade that report on thyroid isthmusectomy. Exclusion criteria included isthmusectomy performed alongside full thyroidectomy or partial thyroid lobectomy, lack of data on tumor characteristics or survival outcomes, and non-English publications where a translation was unavailable. Our review identified a total of 227 patients from seven studies.

RESULTS: The average 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates for patients with isthmus-confined PTC who underwent isthmusectomy were 100 % and 93.1 %, respectively. Similar to that of total thyroidectomy. 3.1 % of patients required completion thyroidectomy. Furthermore, isthmusectomy resulted in fewer surgical complications than total thyroidectomy.

CONCLUSIONS: The scarcity of studies providing detailed tumor characteristics and patient outcomes limits our ability to fully evaluate the safety and efficacy of isthmusectomy for isthmus-confined PTC. Additionally, the variable sample sizes and restricted geographic distribution of the included studies calls into questions the generalizability of their findings. Despite these limitations, the data suggest that isthmusectomy may be a viable surgical option for select patients with small, isthmus-confined PTC. In the absence of a randomized controlled trial on the noninferiority of isthmusectomy, significantly more publications are needed before strong conclusions can be drawn.