We have located links that may give you full text access.
Parent satisfaction with lotion, cream, gel and ointment emollient types: secondary analysis of Best Emollients for Eczema study.
Clinical and Experimental Dermatology 2023 December 20
INTRODUCTION: The main determinant of emollient effectiveness is whether it used, which in turn is linked with user satisfaction.
OBJECTIVES: To compare parental satisfaction with emollients for the treatment of childhood eczema.
METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from the Best Emollients for Eczema (BEE) trial. 550 children aged between 6 months to 12 years were recruited from primary care in England and randomised to use a lotion, cream, gel or ointment as their main emollient for 16 weeks. At week 16 parents were asked to complete an emollient satisfaction questionnaire (ESQ). Completion rates and scores were compared, using chi-squared, t-test calculations, and one-way ANOVA as appropriate.
RESULTS: Data on 378 participants (68.7% of those randomised) were analysed. Mean (SD) ESQ scores were gel 20.9 (5.3), lotion 20.4 (5.6), cream 18.8 (6.3) and ointment 15.2 (6.8) (p<0.0001). In pairwise comparisons, there was a statistically significant difference in mean ESQ scores between ointment and lotion (p<0.0001), ointment and cream (p<0.0001) and ointment and gel (p<0.0001) but not between lotion, cream, and gel. Participants using lotions had highest overall satisfaction and were most likely to continue using their emollient. ESQ scores were correlated with reported emollient use and improvements in parent-reported eczema severity.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, lotions and gels were favoured over creams and ointments. Although satisfaction is determined by personal preference, these results will aid parents, clinicians, and children find the right emollient(s) for them.
OBJECTIVES: To compare parental satisfaction with emollients for the treatment of childhood eczema.
METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from the Best Emollients for Eczema (BEE) trial. 550 children aged between 6 months to 12 years were recruited from primary care in England and randomised to use a lotion, cream, gel or ointment as their main emollient for 16 weeks. At week 16 parents were asked to complete an emollient satisfaction questionnaire (ESQ). Completion rates and scores were compared, using chi-squared, t-test calculations, and one-way ANOVA as appropriate.
RESULTS: Data on 378 participants (68.7% of those randomised) were analysed. Mean (SD) ESQ scores were gel 20.9 (5.3), lotion 20.4 (5.6), cream 18.8 (6.3) and ointment 15.2 (6.8) (p<0.0001). In pairwise comparisons, there was a statistically significant difference in mean ESQ scores between ointment and lotion (p<0.0001), ointment and cream (p<0.0001) and ointment and gel (p<0.0001) but not between lotion, cream, and gel. Participants using lotions had highest overall satisfaction and were most likely to continue using their emollient. ESQ scores were correlated with reported emollient use and improvements in parent-reported eczema severity.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, lotions and gels were favoured over creams and ointments. Although satisfaction is determined by personal preference, these results will aid parents, clinicians, and children find the right emollient(s) for them.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app