Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Investigation of Anti-PF4 versus Anti-PF4/Heparin Reactivities by Fluid-Phase EIA for Four Anti-PF4 Disorders: Classic HIT, Autoimmune HIT, VITT, Spontaneous HIT.

BACKGROUND: Four platelet-activating anti-PF4 disorders are recognized: classic heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (cHIT), autoimmune HIT (aHIT), spontaneous HIT (SpHIT), and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT); all test IgG-positive by solid-phase enzyme-immunoassay (solid-EIA) against PF4/heparin (PF4/H) and/or PF4 alone. A fluid-phase EIA (fluid-EIA) should better discriminate between anti-PF4 and anti-PF4/H antibodies since conformationally-altered PF4 bound to solid-phase is avoided.

OBJECTIVES: To compare anti-PF4 versus anti-PF4/H antibody profiles for anti-PF4 disorders using solid- and fluid-EIAs.

METHODS: We developed a novel fluid-EIA to measure anti-PF4 versus anti-PF4/H antibodies.

RESULTS: By fluid-EIA, 27/27 (100%) cHIT sera tested IgG-positive with PF4/H but only 4/27 (14.8%) tested positive against PF4 alone; all 27 exhibited heparin-enhanced binding. In contrast, 17/17 (100%) VITT sera tested IgG-positive against PF4 alone, with markedly reduced binding against PF4/H; this distinct VITT antibody profile was not evident by solid-EIA. All 15 aHIT sera and all 11 SpHIT sera tested IgG-positive against PF4 alone, with variable reactivity by PF4/H-EIA (heparin enhanced binding in 14/15 and 10/11 aHIT and SpHIT sera, respectively). Remarkably, one SpHIT patient with a VITT-mimicking fluid-EIA profile (PF4>>PF4/H) also resembled VITT clinically (post-viral cerebral vein/sinus thrombosis), with anti-PF4 reactivity correlating inversely with platelet count recovery.

CONCLUSIONS: CHIT and VITT sera showed opposite fluid-EIA profiles (cHIT: PF4/H>>PF4, with most testing negative against PF4 alone; VITT: PF4>>PF4/H, with most testing negative against PF4/H). In contrast, all aHIT/SpHIT sera reacted against PF4 alone, but with variable (usually enhanced) reactivity against PF4/H. VITT-mimicking clinical/serological profiles occurred in only a minority of SpHIT and aHIT patients.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app