We have located links that may give you full text access.
A comparison study of deep muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction.
Microsurgery 2019 Februrary 26
BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction by deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) involves only little rectus abdominis muscle sacrifice. However, the operative procedure may get complicated. We propose here a novel method involving two adjacent perforators and requiring the addition of only the superficial muscle to the flap. This novel technique, termed "deep muscle sparing transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap (DMS-TRAM)," was compared to DIEP and MS-TRAM groups.
METHODS: The subjects were 70 patients. The indication of DMS-TRAM was the distance between two perforators penetrating the deep fascia was <3 cm, and the two perforators ran through the superficial layer of the muscle until they became confluent. All patients were evaluated by contrasting computed tomography. The data of age, body mass index, flap volume, operative time, blood loss, laterality, immediate reconstruction, prior radiation, smoking, re-exploration, total flap necrosis, partial fat necrosis, and abdominal bulging were compared. Ultimately, DMS-TRAM was applied in 20 subjects (28.6%), DIEP in 31 (44.3%), and MS-TRAM in 19 (27.1%).
RESULTS: The volume of blood loss in the DIEP group was significantly higher than that in the DMS-TRAM group (328 ± 182 vs 454 ± 217 mL, p = 0.02), the other factors did not significantly influence. The rate of fat necrosis in DIEP tended to be high (10.0% vs 22.6%, p = 0.22).
CONCLUSIONS: Because DMS-TRAM could preserve the deep muscle and penetrating side of intercostal nerve, it could be performed less sacrifice and there were few bleeding and partial necrosis at the same level as MS-TRAM. DMS-TRAM was effective in the applied cases.
METHODS: The subjects were 70 patients. The indication of DMS-TRAM was the distance between two perforators penetrating the deep fascia was <3 cm, and the two perforators ran through the superficial layer of the muscle until they became confluent. All patients were evaluated by contrasting computed tomography. The data of age, body mass index, flap volume, operative time, blood loss, laterality, immediate reconstruction, prior radiation, smoking, re-exploration, total flap necrosis, partial fat necrosis, and abdominal bulging were compared. Ultimately, DMS-TRAM was applied in 20 subjects (28.6%), DIEP in 31 (44.3%), and MS-TRAM in 19 (27.1%).
RESULTS: The volume of blood loss in the DIEP group was significantly higher than that in the DMS-TRAM group (328 ± 182 vs 454 ± 217 mL, p = 0.02), the other factors did not significantly influence. The rate of fat necrosis in DIEP tended to be high (10.0% vs 22.6%, p = 0.22).
CONCLUSIONS: Because DMS-TRAM could preserve the deep muscle and penetrating side of intercostal nerve, it could be performed less sacrifice and there were few bleeding and partial necrosis at the same level as MS-TRAM. DMS-TRAM was effective in the applied cases.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app