Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Detection of Lumbar Spine Osseous Metastases Using Dual-Energy CT: Phantom Results and Preliminary Clinical Validation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity, tumor conspicuity, and image quality of different material decomposition images of phantoms and patients with nearly isodense bone metastases using rapid-kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT (DECT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-one semianthropomorphic lumbar spine phantoms embedded with 75 simulated tumors were scanned without and with outer torso-attenuating encasement under the same scan settings. Two radiologists independently reviewed the 70-keV virtual monochromatic and material decomposition images (hydroxyapatite-water, water-hydroxyapatite, cortical bone-water, water-cortical bone). The sensitivity of tumor detection, tumor conspicuity (on a 3-point scale), and image quality (on a 3-point scale) were recorded by two independent readers. McNemar and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare results between the image reconstructions. Six clinical abdominopelvic DECT scans (three men, three women; mean age, 52 years) with nine nearly isodense lumbar spine tumors missed in the clinical report but confirmed on other scans were also evaluated.

RESULTS: The hydroxyapatite-water material decomposition algorithm showed improved sensitivity for isodense lesion detection (without torso phantom encasement, 94% vs 82%, p = 0.031; with torso phantom encasement, 38% vs 18%, p = 0.013), and higher tumor conspicuity scores (p < 0.0001) compared with 70-keV virtual monoenergetic images. Artifacts were more prevalent with all material decomposition images than with 70-keV virtual monoenergetic images. Similar results were seen in the patient study.

CONCLUSION: Dual-energy CT with hydroxyapatite-water material decomposition may improve the detection of bone marrow metastases, especially for subtle isodense tumors. Further study in prospective clinical scans is warranted.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app