Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Study
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Random spot urine protein to creatinine ratio is a reliable measure of proteinuria in lupus nephritis in Koreans.

OBJECTIVES: The accurate assessment of proteinuria is critical for the management of lupus nephritis. Measuring the protein to creatinine (P/C) ratio in random spot urine (RSU) samples has been introduced as an alternative to the 24-hour (24h) urine collection method. However, it remains unclear as to whether the RSU P/C ratio is reliable for assessing lupus nephritis (LN) in routine clinical practice.

METHODS: In total, 275 pairs of 24h urine and RSU samples from 102 patients with biopsy-proven LN were analysed. The correlation and concordance between the P/C ratios in the two sample types were assessed by Pearson or Spearman correlation and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) using mixed models for repeated measurements, respectively.

RESULTS: The mean 24h urine P/C ratio was 3.2 ± 4.9. Overall, RSU P/C ratio correlated strongly with the 24h urine P/C ratio (r=0.944, p<0.001) with an excellent agreement (ICC=0.949, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-1.00). Subgroup analyses revealed that the correlation remained high in class II, III, IV, and V LN (rho=0.868, p<0.001; rho=0.649, p=0.007; r=0.945, p<0.001; and rho=0.900, p=0.001, respectively). The correlation between the 24h urine and RSU P/C ratio in the range of 0.5 to 3 was good (r=0.720, p<0.001) with ICC of 0.659 (95%CI 0.554-0.812). RSU P/C ratio ≥0.5 could predict 24h PCR ≥0.5 with 91.7% sensitivity and 70.2% specificity, whereas RSU P/C ratio ≥1.0 increased specificity up to 94.7%.

CONCLUSIONS: The RSU P/C ratio is an excellent alternative to the 24 hour P/C ratio for assessing the presence of clinically significant proteinuria in LN. RSU P/C ratio >1.0 may prompt directly to a renal biopsy, whereas RSU P/C ratio between 0.5-1.0 should be followed by a confirmatory 24h urine collection.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app