We have located links that may give you full text access.
Determinants of serum HDL-C level in a Tehran urban population: the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Decreased serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is one of the most common lipid disorders in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Existing evidence suggests that every 1 mg/dL decrease in serum HDL-C increases the risk of CAD by 2-3%. This study was performed in the year 2000 to study HDL-C determinants in a Tehran population.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 9514 subjects (3942 men and 5572 women) aged 20-69 years, who participated in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS), completed a personal history questionnaire (especially concerning physical activity and cigarette smoking), and underwent a clinical examination including anthropometric and blood pressure measurements. Serum total cholesterol, triglyceride and HDL-C levels were measured, and OGTT was used to define diabetic patients according to WHO criteria. The women had a significantly higher mean HDL-C level than the mean (45 +/- 11 vs 38 +/- 9 mg/dL; p < 0.001); low HDL-C levels (< 35 mg/dL) were observed in 31% of the men and 13% of the women (p < 0.001). Obese subjects (BMI > or = 30 kg/m2) had a significantly lower HDL-C level than the normal subjects (42 +/- 11 vs 44 +/- 11 mg/dL: p < 0.001), and those with truncal obesity (WHR > or = 0.95 in men and > or = 0.8 in women) lower HDL-C levels than the normal subjects (37 +/- 9 vs 39 +/- 10 mg/dL in men and 44 +/- 11 vs 42 +/- 11 mg/dL in women; p < 0.001 for both). Smokers had a significantly lower HDL-C level than non-smokers (38 +/- 10 vs 43 +/- 11 mg/dL; p < 0.001) and a low HDL-C level was twice as common (36.4 vs 18.2%). Passive smokers also had lower HDL-C levels (42 +/- 11 vs 43 +/- 11 mg/dL; p < 0.001). Mean serum HDL-C was significantly lower in hypertriglyceridemic than those with normal triglycerides levels (men: 4 +/- 8 vs 40 +/- 9 mg/dL, p < 0.001; women: 40 +/- 10 vs 47 +/- 11 mg/dL, p < 0.01). Mean HDL-C levels were similar in subjects with different degrees of physical activity, as well as between diabetics and non-diabetics and hypertensive and normotensive subjects. Multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that the determinants of serum HDL-C levels were, in order of entering the model: hypertriglyceridemia (OR 3.4, p < 0.001), male sex (OR 3.1, p < 0.001), cigarette smoking (OR 1.7, p < 0.001), obesity (OR 1.4, p < 0.01), age (OR 0.9, p < 0.05), high WHR (OR 1.2, p < 0.05), and passive smoking (OR 1.1, p < 0.05). Physical activity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus did not enter the predictive model.
CONCLUSION: Apart from age and sex which are constitutional, and unmodifiable variables, the determinants of HDL-C level (hypertriglyceridemia, obesity, truncal obesity, cigarette smoking, and passive smoking) can be used in community CAD prevention programmes.
METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 9514 subjects (3942 men and 5572 women) aged 20-69 years, who participated in the Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study (TLGS), completed a personal history questionnaire (especially concerning physical activity and cigarette smoking), and underwent a clinical examination including anthropometric and blood pressure measurements. Serum total cholesterol, triglyceride and HDL-C levels were measured, and OGTT was used to define diabetic patients according to WHO criteria. The women had a significantly higher mean HDL-C level than the mean (45 +/- 11 vs 38 +/- 9 mg/dL; p < 0.001); low HDL-C levels (< 35 mg/dL) were observed in 31% of the men and 13% of the women (p < 0.001). Obese subjects (BMI > or = 30 kg/m2) had a significantly lower HDL-C level than the normal subjects (42 +/- 11 vs 44 +/- 11 mg/dL: p < 0.001), and those with truncal obesity (WHR > or = 0.95 in men and > or = 0.8 in women) lower HDL-C levels than the normal subjects (37 +/- 9 vs 39 +/- 10 mg/dL in men and 44 +/- 11 vs 42 +/- 11 mg/dL in women; p < 0.001 for both). Smokers had a significantly lower HDL-C level than non-smokers (38 +/- 10 vs 43 +/- 11 mg/dL; p < 0.001) and a low HDL-C level was twice as common (36.4 vs 18.2%). Passive smokers also had lower HDL-C levels (42 +/- 11 vs 43 +/- 11 mg/dL; p < 0.001). Mean serum HDL-C was significantly lower in hypertriglyceridemic than those with normal triglycerides levels (men: 4 +/- 8 vs 40 +/- 9 mg/dL, p < 0.001; women: 40 +/- 10 vs 47 +/- 11 mg/dL, p < 0.01). Mean HDL-C levels were similar in subjects with different degrees of physical activity, as well as between diabetics and non-diabetics and hypertensive and normotensive subjects. Multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that the determinants of serum HDL-C levels were, in order of entering the model: hypertriglyceridemia (OR 3.4, p < 0.001), male sex (OR 3.1, p < 0.001), cigarette smoking (OR 1.7, p < 0.001), obesity (OR 1.4, p < 0.01), age (OR 0.9, p < 0.05), high WHR (OR 1.2, p < 0.05), and passive smoking (OR 1.1, p < 0.05). Physical activity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus did not enter the predictive model.
CONCLUSION: Apart from age and sex which are constitutional, and unmodifiable variables, the determinants of HDL-C level (hypertriglyceridemia, obesity, truncal obesity, cigarette smoking, and passive smoking) can be used in community CAD prevention programmes.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults.Gut 2024 April 17
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Should renin-angiotensin system inhibitors be held prior to major surgery?British Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 May
Ventilator Waveforms May Give Clues to Expiratory Muscle Activity.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2024 April 25
Acute Kidney Injury and Electrolyte Imbalances Caused by Dapagliflozin Short-Term Use.Pharmaceuticals 2024 March 27
Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024.Endoscopy 2024 April 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app