We have located links that may give you full text access.
Sphenoid wing meningioma en plaque: a clinical review.
Acta Neurochirurgica 2001 August
OBJECTIVE: To review the role of craniofacial resection and reconstruction in the treatment of patients with sphenoid wing meningioma en plaque.
DESIGN: 15 patients were reviewed. The presenting features, operative details and complications were documented. The adequacy of resection was reviewed and postoperative scans were analyzed to assess orbital reconstruction. Patients were assessed regarding aesthetics and craniofacial function. The Glasgow outcome scale and the SF36 questionnaire were used to assess outcome.
RESULTS: The majority (92%) presented with proptosis and had disease extending from the sphenoid wing into the orbital roof (71%) and the middle fossa (71%). The transzygomatic approach was the most commonly used approach (85%). 14 patients were examined on an outpatient basis, one patient has died. In the majority of patients visual acuity was unchanged (85%) and in most cases (85%) there was significant improvement in globe position. Ptosis (57%) and upper eyelid swelling (50%) were a persistent problem. Craniofacial function and cosmesis were well maintained. Two patients have had clinical recurrences (14%). 14 have had a good outcome adjudged by the Glasgow outcome scale and most patients have satisfactory outcomes adjudged by the SF36 questionnaire.
CONCLUSIONS: Meningioma en plaque represents a difficult surgical challenge requiring a multidisciplinary approach. By using well established craniofacial techniques good disease control can be achieved with minimal morbidity and good functional and cosmetic results.
DESIGN: 15 patients were reviewed. The presenting features, operative details and complications were documented. The adequacy of resection was reviewed and postoperative scans were analyzed to assess orbital reconstruction. Patients were assessed regarding aesthetics and craniofacial function. The Glasgow outcome scale and the SF36 questionnaire were used to assess outcome.
RESULTS: The majority (92%) presented with proptosis and had disease extending from the sphenoid wing into the orbital roof (71%) and the middle fossa (71%). The transzygomatic approach was the most commonly used approach (85%). 14 patients were examined on an outpatient basis, one patient has died. In the majority of patients visual acuity was unchanged (85%) and in most cases (85%) there was significant improvement in globe position. Ptosis (57%) and upper eyelid swelling (50%) were a persistent problem. Craniofacial function and cosmesis were well maintained. Two patients have had clinical recurrences (14%). 14 have had a good outcome adjudged by the Glasgow outcome scale and most patients have satisfactory outcomes adjudged by the SF36 questionnaire.
CONCLUSIONS: Meningioma en plaque represents a difficult surgical challenge requiring a multidisciplinary approach. By using well established craniofacial techniques good disease control can be achieved with minimal morbidity and good functional and cosmetic results.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults.Gut 2024 April 17
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Ventilator Waveforms May Give Clues to Expiratory Muscle Activity.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2024 April 25
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Acute Kidney Injury and Electrolyte Imbalances Caused by Dapagliflozin Short-Term Use.Pharmaceuticals 2024 March 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app