We have located links that may give you full text access.
Indications for early mandatory laparotomy in abdominal stab wounds.
British Journal of Surgery 1999 January
BACKGROUND: Patients with an abdominal stab wound presenting with shock, peritonitis or evisceration are usually subjected to early laparotomy, although very few studies have been done to validate the criteria.
METHODS: In a retrospective study of 209 consecutive patients with stab wounds of the anterior abdomen, flank or lower chest, 23 clinical and radiological criteria were evaluated for their accuracy in predicting the presence of significant abdominal organ injury.
RESULTS: Overall, 89 patients (43 per cent) had a significant abdominal injury. The criteria with the highest positive predictive values for significant injury were: signs of continuing haemorrhage in initially normotensive patients (86 per cent), shock on admission (83 per cent) and generalized peritonitis (81 per cent). No positive direct or indirect signs of peritoneal penetration including omental evisceration, extraluminal air on plain radiography, or free peritoneal fluid on abdominal ultrasonography were independent predictors of significant injury.
CONCLUSION: Signs of major internal haemorrhage or generalized peritonitis are reliable criteria by themselves for early laparotomy. Peritoneal penetration is a poor indicator of significant organ injury and warrants direct organ-specific evaluation, such as computed tomography or laparoscopy, to identify patients who can safely be treated without operation.
METHODS: In a retrospective study of 209 consecutive patients with stab wounds of the anterior abdomen, flank or lower chest, 23 clinical and radiological criteria were evaluated for their accuracy in predicting the presence of significant abdominal organ injury.
RESULTS: Overall, 89 patients (43 per cent) had a significant abdominal injury. The criteria with the highest positive predictive values for significant injury were: signs of continuing haemorrhage in initially normotensive patients (86 per cent), shock on admission (83 per cent) and generalized peritonitis (81 per cent). No positive direct or indirect signs of peritoneal penetration including omental evisceration, extraluminal air on plain radiography, or free peritoneal fluid on abdominal ultrasonography were independent predictors of significant injury.
CONCLUSION: Signs of major internal haemorrhage or generalized peritonitis are reliable criteria by themselves for early laparotomy. Peritoneal penetration is a poor indicator of significant organ injury and warrants direct organ-specific evaluation, such as computed tomography or laparoscopy, to identify patients who can safely be treated without operation.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults.Gut 2024 April 17
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Should renin-angiotensin system inhibitors be held prior to major surgery?British Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 May
Ventilator Waveforms May Give Clues to Expiratory Muscle Activity.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2024 April 25
Acute Kidney Injury and Electrolyte Imbalances Caused by Dapagliflozin Short-Term Use.Pharmaceuticals 2024 March 27
Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024.Endoscopy 2024 April 27
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app