We have located links that may give you full text access.
Prostate carcinoma: assessment of diagnostic criteria for capsular penetration on endorectal coil MR images.
Radiology 1994 November
PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of using several criteria to evaluate endorectal coil magnetic resonance (MR) images for penetration of the prostatic capsule.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with prostate carcinoma underwent MR imaging and prostatectomy. Specified sites of potential capsular penetration on MR images were blindly evaluated by three readers for six diagnostic criteria. These evaluations were compared with pathologic findings of capsular penetration and were analyzed by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve (Az) for the readers' overall impression of capsular penetration varied from .72 to .77. Highest mean Az's were for the criteria of capsular thickening (.74) and nodular extracapsular tumor (.72), although the latter finding had poor sensitivity (15%). Interobserver variation was low for all findings.
CONCLUSION: Sensitivity and specificity were generally low for the diagnostic criteria. The usefulness of endorectal coil MR imaging in staging prostate cancer may be limited by the lack of diagnostic signs that uniformly identify extracapsular penetration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with prostate carcinoma underwent MR imaging and prostatectomy. Specified sites of potential capsular penetration on MR images were blindly evaluated by three readers for six diagnostic criteria. These evaluations were compared with pathologic findings of capsular penetration and were analyzed by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
RESULTS: The area under the ROC curve (Az) for the readers' overall impression of capsular penetration varied from .72 to .77. Highest mean Az's were for the criteria of capsular thickening (.74) and nodular extracapsular tumor (.72), although the latter finding had poor sensitivity (15%). Interobserver variation was low for all findings.
CONCLUSION: Sensitivity and specificity were generally low for the diagnostic criteria. The usefulness of endorectal coil MR imaging in staging prostate cancer may be limited by the lack of diagnostic signs that uniformly identify extracapsular penetration.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Haemodynamic monitoring during noncardiac surgery: past, present, and future.Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2024 April 31
2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Circulation 2024 May 9
Obesity pharmacotherapy in older adults: a narrative review of evidence.International Journal of Obesity 2024 May 7
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app