We have located links that may give you full text access.
The role of minimally invasive surgery in gynaecological cancer: an overview of current trends.
Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn 2024 March
BACKGROUND: The capabilities of minimally invasive surgery, either as conventional laparoscopy, or as robotic surgery, have increased to an extent that it enables complex operations in the field of gynaecological oncology.
OBJECTIVE: To document the role of minimally invasive gynaecological surgery in cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the literature that shaped international guidelines and clinical practice.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Current guidelines of major international scientific associations and trends in accepted clinical practice.
RESULTS: In recent years, evidence on oncologic outcome has limited the role of minimally invasive techniques in cervical cancer, while the treatment of early endometrial cancer with laparoscopy and robotic surgery has become the international standard. In ovarian cancer, the role of minimally invasive surgery is still limited. Current evidence on perioperative morbidity underlines the necessity to implicate minimally invasive techniques whenever possible.
CONCLUSION: The optimal surgical route for the treatment of gynaecological cancer remains in many cases controversial. The role of minimally invasive surgery remains increasing in the course of time.
WHAT IS NEW?: This comprehensive review offers an entire perspective on the current role of minimally invasive surgery in gynaecological cancer therapy.
OBJECTIVE: To document the role of minimally invasive gynaecological surgery in cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A review of the literature that shaped international guidelines and clinical practice.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Current guidelines of major international scientific associations and trends in accepted clinical practice.
RESULTS: In recent years, evidence on oncologic outcome has limited the role of minimally invasive techniques in cervical cancer, while the treatment of early endometrial cancer with laparoscopy and robotic surgery has become the international standard. In ovarian cancer, the role of minimally invasive surgery is still limited. Current evidence on perioperative morbidity underlines the necessity to implicate minimally invasive techniques whenever possible.
CONCLUSION: The optimal surgical route for the treatment of gynaecological cancer remains in many cases controversial. The role of minimally invasive surgery remains increasing in the course of time.
WHAT IS NEW?: This comprehensive review offers an entire perspective on the current role of minimally invasive surgery in gynaecological cancer therapy.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Management of Diverticulitis: A Review.JAMA Surgery 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app