Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Characterization, Shear Bond Strength Assessment, and Antibacterial Effects of an Orthodontic Composite Containing Stannous Oxide (SnO2) Nanoparticles.

Curēus 2024 Februrary
Background This study aimed to determine the antibacterial properties of orthodontic adhesive infused with stannous oxide nanoparticles (NPs) against Lactobacillus acidophilus and Streptococcus mutans bacteria, along with assessing the shear bond strength (SBS) of this composite when compared to conventional, non-infused composites. Methods A concentration of 1% w/w tin dioxide NPs (SnO2 NPs) was added to Transbond XT Orthodontic Adhesive. This modified composite material was used to prepare composite discs for the evaluation of its antibacterial properties against L. acidophilus bacteria and S. mutans bacteria using the biofilm inhibition test. To evaluate the SBS of this modified adhesive material, 50 extracted premolar teeth were collected and divided into two groups, with 25 teeth in each group (n = 25). Orthodontic stainless steel brackets were bonded to these extracted teeth using the modified composite. A comparative analysis of the SBS of the nano-infused composite group was then performed against that of the control group using an Instron universal testing machine. Results Growth inhibition zones were produced around the composite discs infused with SnO2 NPs for both bacterial strains. After performing the biofilm inhibition test, it can be inferred that the nano-infused composite is capable of inhibiting the bacterial count better than the control group. A statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups, with the SBS of the nano-infused composite being higher (16.89 MPa) than the non-infused composite adhesive (15.49 MPa). Conclusion The antibacterial activity of orthodontic composites modified with SnO2 NPs was significant compared with conventional composites. The control group showed less SBS when compared to the NP-infused composite, with a statistically significant difference in mean SBS values between both groups.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app