We have located links that may give you full text access.
Arterial spin labeling combined with T1 mapping for assessment of kidney function and histopathology in patients with long-term renal transplant survival after kidney transplantation.
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery 2024 March 16
BACKGROUND: The long-term survival of kidney transplants is often influenced by various factors, among which renal allograft rejection is the most notable factor. A noninvasive and reliable imaging biomarker correlating with kidney function and histopathology would facilitate longitudinal long-term follow-up of renal allografts. The aim of the study is to investigate the value of arterial spin labeling (ASL) combined with T1 mapping for assessing kidney function in patients with long-term renal transplant survival, and to establish radiological and histopathologic correlations between the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements and kidney allograft biopsy findings.
METHODS: Kidney transplant recipients who were admitted to the Department of Urology in First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between January and December 2022 were prospectively consecutively recruited [group A, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ; group B, 30≤ eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ; group C, eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 ], and part of them underwent biopsies. All patients underwent ASL and T1 mapping. MRI parameters were calculated and analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 63 patients (Group A, 30 cases; Group B, 20 cases; and Group C, 13 cases) were included in this cross-sectional study. Cortical T1 increased, whereas renal blood flow (RBF) and ΔT1 [100% × (cortical T1 - medullary T1)/cortical T1] decreased with the decrease of eGFR. The RBF, cortical T1, and ΔT1 values were moderately correlated with eGFR (r=0.569, -0.573, and 0.672, respectively). The MRI parameters were moderately correlated with Banff scores, which determined renal allograft rejection and chronicity. The area under the curve (AUC) for the discrimination of groups A versus B and groups A versus C were 0.740 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.597-0.854, P=0.004] and 0.923 (95% CI: 0.800-0.982, P<0.001), respectively, using ASL; 0.873 (95% CI: 0.749-0.950, P<0.001) and 0.926 (95% CI: 0.803-0.983, P<0.001), respectively, using T1 mapping; and 0.892 (95% CI: 0.771-0.962, P<0.001) and 0.956 (95% CI: 0.846-0.995, P<0.001), respectively, using multi-parameter MRI. The AUC for discrimination between groups B and C was 0.729 (95% CI: 0.546-0.868, P=0.02) using ASL.
CONCLUSIONS: The RBF, cortical T1, and ΔT1 can serve as new imaging biomarkers of kidney function and histopathological microstructure.
METHODS: Kidney transplant recipients who were admitted to the Department of Urology in First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University between January and December 2022 were prospectively consecutively recruited [group A, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ; group B, 30≤ eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ; group C, eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 ], and part of them underwent biopsies. All patients underwent ASL and T1 mapping. MRI parameters were calculated and analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 63 patients (Group A, 30 cases; Group B, 20 cases; and Group C, 13 cases) were included in this cross-sectional study. Cortical T1 increased, whereas renal blood flow (RBF) and ΔT1 [100% × (cortical T1 - medullary T1)/cortical T1] decreased with the decrease of eGFR. The RBF, cortical T1, and ΔT1 values were moderately correlated with eGFR (r=0.569, -0.573, and 0.672, respectively). The MRI parameters were moderately correlated with Banff scores, which determined renal allograft rejection and chronicity. The area under the curve (AUC) for the discrimination of groups A versus B and groups A versus C were 0.740 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.597-0.854, P=0.004] and 0.923 (95% CI: 0.800-0.982, P<0.001), respectively, using ASL; 0.873 (95% CI: 0.749-0.950, P<0.001) and 0.926 (95% CI: 0.803-0.983, P<0.001), respectively, using T1 mapping; and 0.892 (95% CI: 0.771-0.962, P<0.001) and 0.956 (95% CI: 0.846-0.995, P<0.001), respectively, using multi-parameter MRI. The AUC for discrimination between groups B and C was 0.729 (95% CI: 0.546-0.868, P=0.02) using ASL.
CONCLUSIONS: The RBF, cortical T1, and ΔT1 can serve as new imaging biomarkers of kidney function and histopathological microstructure.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app