We have located links that may give you full text access.
Age-related macular degeneration discordance in monozygotic twin pairs.
Acta Ophthalmologica 2024 March 26
PURPOSE: To examine age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)-Bruch's membrane (BrM) complex volume associations in monozygotic twin pairs.
METHODS: In this study, 106 elderly twins (53 twin pairs) from the Finnish Twin Cohort study were recruited. Each participant underwent dilated 35-degree digital colour fundus photography (CFP), and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and replied to a structured study questionnaire. The CFPs were graded according to the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) classification. The OCT images were segmented and volumetric data of the RPE-BrM complex volume was calculated with the Orion™ software. The worse eye according to AREDS classification was used for the analysis.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine (55%) of the twin pairs were discordant with regard to AREDS classification. Fourteen (26%) pairs were discordant with one twin participant having AMD (AREDS 2-4) and the other being unaffected (AREDS 1). Four (8%) pairs had one twin participant with intermediate or late AMD (AREDS 3-4) versus the other being unaffected (AREDS 1). The within-pair polychoric correlation for AREDS was 0.605 (95% confidence interval 0.418-0.792). In multivariate analysis intermediate and late AMD as well as age associated with RPE-BrM complex volume. RPE-BrM complex volume showed a within twin pair correlation, r = 0.430 (95% confidence interval 0.172-0.688, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of monozygotic twin pairs are discordant with regard to age-related macular degeneration phenotype. RPE-BrM complex volume associated with age and intermediate and late AMD.
METHODS: In this study, 106 elderly twins (53 twin pairs) from the Finnish Twin Cohort study were recruited. Each participant underwent dilated 35-degree digital colour fundus photography (CFP), and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and replied to a structured study questionnaire. The CFPs were graded according to the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) classification. The OCT images were segmented and volumetric data of the RPE-BrM complex volume was calculated with the Orion™ software. The worse eye according to AREDS classification was used for the analysis.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine (55%) of the twin pairs were discordant with regard to AREDS classification. Fourteen (26%) pairs were discordant with one twin participant having AMD (AREDS 2-4) and the other being unaffected (AREDS 1). Four (8%) pairs had one twin participant with intermediate or late AMD (AREDS 3-4) versus the other being unaffected (AREDS 1). The within-pair polychoric correlation for AREDS was 0.605 (95% confidence interval 0.418-0.792). In multivariate analysis intermediate and late AMD as well as age associated with RPE-BrM complex volume. RPE-BrM complex volume showed a within twin pair correlation, r = 0.430 (95% confidence interval 0.172-0.688, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of monozygotic twin pairs are discordant with regard to age-related macular degeneration phenotype. RPE-BrM complex volume associated with age and intermediate and late AMD.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app