We have located links that may give you full text access.
What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles among anovulatory women? A retrospective cohort study.
OBJECTIVE: Different endometrial preparation protocols are used prior to frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET). It is not clear whether letrozole-stimulated cycles are beneficial for anovulatory women compared to artificial cycles (AC) in anovulatory women. Our objective was to investigate whether clinical outcomes following frozen-thawed embryo transfer in letrozole-stimulated cycles differ from artificial cycles in anovulatory women.
STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted in a public fertility center in China comparing letrozole-stimulated and artificial cycles during FET. A total of 5,322 anovulatory women undergoing the first cycle of FET between January 2020 and December 2021. The primary outcome was the live birth rate. The secondary outcomes included biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy.
RESULTS: The live birth rates were significantly higher in the letrozole compared with AC (49.57 % vs. 45.22 %) both in the crude (odds ratio [OR] 1.19, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.40) and adjusted analysis (aOR 1.27, 95 %CI 1.08-1.50). After controlling for potential covariates, the adjusted probability of biochemical pregnancy (65.71 % vs. 63.25 %, aOR 1.20, 95 %CI: 1.01-1.43), clinical pregnancy (61.53 % vs. 58.79 %, aOR 1.20, 95 %CI: 1.02-1.43), and ongoing pregnancy (50.14 % vs. 45.66 %, aOR 1.28, 95 %CI: 1.08-1.51) were higher among those using letrozole-stimulated cycles than among those undergoing artificial cycles. The miscarriage rate was lower following letrozole compared with artificial cycles (aOR 0.59, 95 %CI: 0.43-0.80). The ectopic pregnancy in the letrozole group was similar to that in the artificial cycles.
CONCLUSIONS: Letrozole-stimulated FET was significantly associated with higher rates of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy and live birth, and with a lower rate of miscarriage, compared with artificial cycles.
STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted in a public fertility center in China comparing letrozole-stimulated and artificial cycles during FET. A total of 5,322 anovulatory women undergoing the first cycle of FET between January 2020 and December 2021. The primary outcome was the live birth rate. The secondary outcomes included biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, miscarriage, and ectopic pregnancy.
RESULTS: The live birth rates were significantly higher in the letrozole compared with AC (49.57 % vs. 45.22 %) both in the crude (odds ratio [OR] 1.19, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.40) and adjusted analysis (aOR 1.27, 95 %CI 1.08-1.50). After controlling for potential covariates, the adjusted probability of biochemical pregnancy (65.71 % vs. 63.25 %, aOR 1.20, 95 %CI: 1.01-1.43), clinical pregnancy (61.53 % vs. 58.79 %, aOR 1.20, 95 %CI: 1.02-1.43), and ongoing pregnancy (50.14 % vs. 45.66 %, aOR 1.28, 95 %CI: 1.08-1.51) were higher among those using letrozole-stimulated cycles than among those undergoing artificial cycles. The miscarriage rate was lower following letrozole compared with artificial cycles (aOR 0.59, 95 %CI: 0.43-0.80). The ectopic pregnancy in the letrozole group was similar to that in the artificial cycles.
CONCLUSIONS: Letrozole-stimulated FET was significantly associated with higher rates of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy and live birth, and with a lower rate of miscarriage, compared with artificial cycles.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Hemodynamic Support in Sepsis.Anesthesiology 2024 June 2
The New Challenge of Obesity - Obesity-Associated Nephropathy.Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity 2024
Advances in Clinical Cardiology 2023: A Summary of Key Clinical Trials.Advances in Therapy 2024 May 15
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app