Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Induction in Pancreas Transplantation: T-cell Depletion Versus IL-2 Receptor Blockade.

UNLABELLED: There is limited data exist on relative outcomes with T-depletion versus IL-2 receptor (IL2R) blockade induction in pancreas transplantation.

METHODS: We analyzed all patients who underwent simultaneous pancreas-kidney or pancreas transplant alone at our institution between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019.

RESULTS: Of 417 pancreas transplant recipients, 291 received induction with a T-depleting agent and 126 received induction with an IL2R blocker. No difference was detected in pancreas allograft death-censored ( P  = 0.7) or uncensored ( P  = 0.5) survival. Although pancreas rejection was more common overall ( P  = 0.03), this difference was no longer present in recipients at low immunologic risk ( P  = 0.08). Cytomegalovirus and bacterial infections were significantly more common in the patients who received T-cell depleting agents for induction (21% versus 11%, P  = 0.03; 34% versus 23%, P  = 0.04, respectively). On multivariate analysis, history of pancreas rejection (Hazard ratio (HR) = 4.7, P  = 0.0001; 95% Confidence interval (CI), 2.16-10.12) and higher calculated panel reactive antibodies (HR = 1.01, P  = 0.04; 95% CI, 1.0002-1.02) were associated with increased risk of pancreas allograft failure, but choice of induction was not (HR = 0.64, P  = 0.3; 95% CI, 0.27-1.51). Further, on multivariate analysis, Cytomegalovirus infection was associated with increased risk of pancreas allograft rejection (HR = 1.78, P  = 0.01; 95% CI, 1.11-2.87), but choice of induction was not (HR = 0.84, P  = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.54-1.32). Similarly, bacterial infection was associated with increased risk of patient death (HR = 2.94, P  = 0.04; 95% CI, 1.03-8.32).

CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that IL-2 receptor blockade may be a reasonable choice of induction for pancreas transplant recipients at low immunologic risk.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app