We have located links that may give you full text access.
Simple electrocardiography algorithm for localizing accessory pathway in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.
Acta Cardiologica 2022 August 11
BACKGROUND: Existing algorithms to predict the location of an accessory pathway (AP) in Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome (WPW) have good sensitivity and specificity but complex with various accuracy and inter-observer agreement rates. A simple algorithm with high accuracy and inter-observer agreement rates is needed.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional and retrospective diagnostic study. The data were collected by total population sampling from January 2015 to January 2017. Forty-seven patients were included in the study. Data collected were pre-ablation 12-lead ECGs and ablation reports. These ECGs were evaluated by two independent observers using the simplified algorithm and compared with ablation results.
RESULTS: The algorithm had a sensitivity of 45% on the left free wall, 80% on septal, 92% on the right free wall, and the specificity of 96% on the left free wall, 69% on the septal, 85% on the right free wall for AP prediction. The positive predictive value was 90% on the left free wall, 55% on the septal, and 67% on the right free wall APs. The negative predictive value was 70% on the left free wall, 88% on the septal, and 97% on right free wall AP. The positive likelihood ratio was 11.23 on the left free wall, 2.23 on septal and 6.57 on right free wall APs, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.57 on left free wall APs, 0.28 on septal, and 0.09 on the right free wall APs. Algorithm accuracy varied from 73-87%. Inter-observer agreement calculation was kappa 0.93 for left free wall AP, 0.78 for septal AP, and 0.74 for right free wall AP.
CONCLUSION: This simple algorithm has a remarkable accuracy and inter-observer agreement; therefore, it may prove to be helpful even to non-electrophysiologists and has the potential to be integrated into clinical practice.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional and retrospective diagnostic study. The data were collected by total population sampling from January 2015 to January 2017. Forty-seven patients were included in the study. Data collected were pre-ablation 12-lead ECGs and ablation reports. These ECGs were evaluated by two independent observers using the simplified algorithm and compared with ablation results.
RESULTS: The algorithm had a sensitivity of 45% on the left free wall, 80% on septal, 92% on the right free wall, and the specificity of 96% on the left free wall, 69% on the septal, 85% on the right free wall for AP prediction. The positive predictive value was 90% on the left free wall, 55% on the septal, and 67% on the right free wall APs. The negative predictive value was 70% on the left free wall, 88% on the septal, and 97% on right free wall AP. The positive likelihood ratio was 11.23 on the left free wall, 2.23 on septal and 6.57 on right free wall APs, and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.57 on left free wall APs, 0.28 on septal, and 0.09 on the right free wall APs. Algorithm accuracy varied from 73-87%. Inter-observer agreement calculation was kappa 0.93 for left free wall AP, 0.78 for septal AP, and 0.74 for right free wall AP.
CONCLUSION: This simple algorithm has a remarkable accuracy and inter-observer agreement; therefore, it may prove to be helpful even to non-electrophysiologists and has the potential to be integrated into clinical practice.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app