English Abstract
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Microhematuria of renal origin--differential diagnosis, clarification and interpretation].

Microhematuria offers a wide spectrum of diagnostic possibilities. Once the finding is confirmed, the diagnosis of prerenal, renal-parenchymatous and postrenal (or even factitious) hematuria and differentiation between glomerular and nonglomerular bleeding sources is based on the patient's history, a complete clinical status, special urinary findings (mainly red cell casts, proteinuria and red cell morphology) and blood chemistry (serum creatinine or creatinine clearance). If on the basis of this information glomerular or renal-parenchymatous microhematuria seems likely, further diagnostic procedures include immunological tests and, if indicated and justified, renal biopsy. Urography and other imaging procedures, urinary cytology and cystoscopy (firmly indicated when doubts persist or all the evidence points to postrenal hematuria) are deferred whenever glomerular hematuria seems likely. The special aspects of isolated renal microhematuria are discussed.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app