We have located links that may give you full text access.
Quantitative MRI in patients with gluteal tendinopathy and asymptomatic volunteers: initial results on T1- and T2*-mapping diagnostic accuracy and correlation with clinical assessment.
Skeletal Radiology 2021 November
OBJECTIVE: To determine if T1- and T2*-mapping of the gluteal tendons can discriminate between participants with and without clinical findings of gluteal tendinopathy (GT) and if they correlate with clinical assessment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted between January and December 2016. MRI of the hip included spin echo, short-T1 inversion recovery, variable-flip angle, and variable echo-time gradient echo sequences. MRI studies were reviewed independently by two radiologists. Two other readers segmented the gluteal tendons and T1, mono- (T2*m ) and bi-exponential T2* (short (T2*s ) and long (T2*l ) components) were computed.
RESULTS: Ten participants with GT (median age; interquartile range: 63 (57-67) years, all women) and 9 participants without GT (57 (55-59) years, 8 women) (P = 0.06) were enrolled. The sensitivity and specificity of reader 1 for disease classification were 40% (95% confidence interval (CI): 17-61%) and 70% (CI: 47-91%), and those of reader 2 were 70% (CI: 43-86%) and 80% (CI: 53-96%), with fair inter-reader agreement (Kappa = .38). T1 values could not discriminate between the two groups. The gluteal tendons T2*m and T2*s showed diagnostic accuracy ranging from .80 to .89. The posterior gluteus medius tendon T2*m and T2*s respectively showed sensitivity and specificity of 90%, and strong correlation (Spearman's rho = -.71; P = 0.02) with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale score.
CONCLUSION: Quantitative MRI could help gain new insight into healthy and diseased gluteal tendons to allow better diagnosis and treatment stratification for patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was conducted between January and December 2016. MRI of the hip included spin echo, short-T1 inversion recovery, variable-flip angle, and variable echo-time gradient echo sequences. MRI studies were reviewed independently by two radiologists. Two other readers segmented the gluteal tendons and T1, mono- (T2*m ) and bi-exponential T2* (short (T2*s ) and long (T2*l ) components) were computed.
RESULTS: Ten participants with GT (median age; interquartile range: 63 (57-67) years, all women) and 9 participants without GT (57 (55-59) years, 8 women) (P = 0.06) were enrolled. The sensitivity and specificity of reader 1 for disease classification were 40% (95% confidence interval (CI): 17-61%) and 70% (CI: 47-91%), and those of reader 2 were 70% (CI: 43-86%) and 80% (CI: 53-96%), with fair inter-reader agreement (Kappa = .38). T1 values could not discriminate between the two groups. The gluteal tendons T2*m and T2*s showed diagnostic accuracy ranging from .80 to .89. The posterior gluteus medius tendon T2*m and T2*s respectively showed sensitivity and specificity of 90%, and strong correlation (Spearman's rho = -.71; P = 0.02) with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale score.
CONCLUSION: Quantitative MRI could help gain new insight into healthy and diseased gluteal tendons to allow better diagnosis and treatment stratification for patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Executive Summary: State-of-the-Art Review: Unintended Consequences: Risk of Opportunistic Infections Associated with Long-term Glucocorticoid Therapies in Adults.Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 April 11
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemias: Classifications, Pathophysiology, Diagnoses and Management.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 13
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app