We have located links that may give you full text access.
Circumscribed choroidal hemangioma: Clinical features and outcomes by age category in 458 cases.
Purpose: To investigate features and outcomes of circumscribed choroidal hemangioma by patient age.
Methods: Retrospective review of circumscribed choroidal hemangioma from 3/29/1967-6/4/2018 based on age at presentation (≤20 vs. >20-50 vs. >50 years).
Results: There were 458 circumscribed choroidal hemangiomas diagnosed at mean age (13 vs. 41 vs. 64 years, p < 0.001). The youngest age group had worse presenting visual acuity (20/400 vs. 20/150 vs. 20/100, p < 0.001), larger tumor basal diameter (13.5 vs. 6.6 vs. 6.2, p < 0.001), greater tumor thickness (5.8 vs. 3.1 vs. 2.9, p < 0.001), closer distance to foveola (0.5 vs. 1.4 vs. 1.2, p = 0.03), and greater extent of subretinal fluid (4 quadrants, 26% vs. 8% vs. 2%, p < 0.001). The youngest patients were less likely to be treated with primary observation (39% vs. 39% vs. 56%) or photodynamic therapy (10% vs. 27% vs. 22%) and more likely to be treated with plaque radiotherapy (26% vs. 6% vs. 3%) or external beam radiotherapy (13% vs. 1% vs. 0%) ( p < 0.001). The youngest patients required greater total number of treatments (mean 4 vs. 2 vs. 1, p < 0.001). At mean follow-up (44 vs. 68 vs. 60 months, p = 0.37), the youngest patients had worse visual acuity (20/400 vs. 20/200 vs. 20/100, p = 0.03), but no difference in visual acuity loss of 3 or more Snellen lines (27% vs. 13% vs. 16%, p = 0.55).
Conclusion: Younger patients (≤20 years) with circumscribed choroidal hemangioma present with worse visual acuity and larger, more posterior tumors. Future studies are needed to improve early detection and treatment for this subgroup of patients.
Methods: Retrospective review of circumscribed choroidal hemangioma from 3/29/1967-6/4/2018 based on age at presentation (≤20 vs. >20-50 vs. >50 years).
Results: There were 458 circumscribed choroidal hemangiomas diagnosed at mean age (13 vs. 41 vs. 64 years, p < 0.001). The youngest age group had worse presenting visual acuity (20/400 vs. 20/150 vs. 20/100, p < 0.001), larger tumor basal diameter (13.5 vs. 6.6 vs. 6.2, p < 0.001), greater tumor thickness (5.8 vs. 3.1 vs. 2.9, p < 0.001), closer distance to foveola (0.5 vs. 1.4 vs. 1.2, p = 0.03), and greater extent of subretinal fluid (4 quadrants, 26% vs. 8% vs. 2%, p < 0.001). The youngest patients were less likely to be treated with primary observation (39% vs. 39% vs. 56%) or photodynamic therapy (10% vs. 27% vs. 22%) and more likely to be treated with plaque radiotherapy (26% vs. 6% vs. 3%) or external beam radiotherapy (13% vs. 1% vs. 0%) ( p < 0.001). The youngest patients required greater total number of treatments (mean 4 vs. 2 vs. 1, p < 0.001). At mean follow-up (44 vs. 68 vs. 60 months, p = 0.37), the youngest patients had worse visual acuity (20/400 vs. 20/200 vs. 20/100, p = 0.03), but no difference in visual acuity loss of 3 or more Snellen lines (27% vs. 13% vs. 16%, p = 0.55).
Conclusion: Younger patients (≤20 years) with circumscribed choroidal hemangioma present with worse visual acuity and larger, more posterior tumors. Future studies are needed to improve early detection and treatment for this subgroup of patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Haemodynamic monitoring during noncardiac surgery: past, present, and future.Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2024 April 31
Obesity pharmacotherapy in older adults: a narrative review of evidence.International Journal of Obesity 2024 May 7
2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR Guideline for the Management of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines.Circulation 2024 May 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app