We have located links that may give you full text access.
Asking for Feedback: Clinical Nurses' Perceptions of a Peer Review Program in a Community Hospital.
Journal of Nursing Administration 2018 November 29
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to understand clinical nurses' perceptions of their participation in a formal, annual peer review process at a metropolitan community hospital.
BACKGROUND: Peer review is an essential component of professional nursing practice for self-regulation of the practice and promotion of quality and safety. Robust empirical evidence of formalized and effective peer review nursing processes is not evident.
METHODS: A descriptive qualitative study with focus group interviews was used.
RESULTS: Study results validate that peer review is a meaningful and valuable process used by clinical nurses to support professional growth and development. Nurses reported using their specific peer feedback as part of their annual goal setting.
CONCLUSIONS: Results validate the importance of implementation of a structured, formal peer review process at the organizational level. The study findings identify that the essential components of an effective peer review process include education for peer facilitators and clinical nurses; dedicated time, space, and privacy to conduct peer reviews; and leadership support.
BACKGROUND: Peer review is an essential component of professional nursing practice for self-regulation of the practice and promotion of quality and safety. Robust empirical evidence of formalized and effective peer review nursing processes is not evident.
METHODS: A descriptive qualitative study with focus group interviews was used.
RESULTS: Study results validate that peer review is a meaningful and valuable process used by clinical nurses to support professional growth and development. Nurses reported using their specific peer feedback as part of their annual goal setting.
CONCLUSIONS: Results validate the importance of implementation of a structured, formal peer review process at the organizational level. The study findings identify that the essential components of an effective peer review process include education for peer facilitators and clinical nurses; dedicated time, space, and privacy to conduct peer reviews; and leadership support.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Ventilator Waveforms May Give Clues to Expiratory Muscle Activity.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2024 April 25
Acute Kidney Injury and Electrolyte Imbalances Caused by Dapagliflozin Short-Term Use.Pharmaceuticals 2024 March 27
Systemic lupus erythematosus.Lancet 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app