We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Comparing subjective and objective image quality at two different radiation exposure ranges of the paranasal sinus CT examinations using a volumetric 320-row detector CT system.
Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology 2017 December
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate image quality of protocol including 135 kVp, 5 mAs and 80 kVp, 5 mAs in the paranasal sinus CT examinations using single volumetric 320-row multidetector CT technique.
METHODS: From September to December 2016, both of our control group including 135 kVp and 5 mAs and our study group including 80 kVp and 5 mAs paranasal CT protocols were simultaneously performed on 40 patients using single volumetric 320-row multidetector CT device. Image quality for bony structures, air-filled structures and soft tissues were independently assessed for each group by three blinded observers using a 3-point grading scale (0 = not diagnostic, 1 = partially diagnostic, 2 = diagnostic). Objective image quality was also performed by region of interests were placed on axial soft tissue reconstructions in both eye bulbs, retrobulbar fat and maxillary sinuses to obtain different values for aqueous tissue, soft tissue and air, respectively. Effective dose was calculated from the dose-length product.
RESULTS: The effective radiation dose which calculated for the control group scans was 0.037 ± 0.003 mSv. But, it was 0.0099 ± 0.001 mSv for the study group scans. The effective radiation dose of study group was statistically significant lower than control group (p < 0.001). Despite significant lowering of the radiation doses, image qualities were sufficient for evaluating all the bony structures, air-filled structures and soft tissues except for eye muscle, retrobulbar fat and eye bulb.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results present that our protocols for study and control group provide significant dose reduction without the loss of diagnostic image quality for paranasal sinus CT. Paranasal sinus CT imaging can be performed at very low radiation exposure maintaining high image quality using a single volume 320-row detector CT device using 135 kVp and 5 mAs.
METHODS: From September to December 2016, both of our control group including 135 kVp and 5 mAs and our study group including 80 kVp and 5 mAs paranasal CT protocols were simultaneously performed on 40 patients using single volumetric 320-row multidetector CT device. Image quality for bony structures, air-filled structures and soft tissues were independently assessed for each group by three blinded observers using a 3-point grading scale (0 = not diagnostic, 1 = partially diagnostic, 2 = diagnostic). Objective image quality was also performed by region of interests were placed on axial soft tissue reconstructions in both eye bulbs, retrobulbar fat and maxillary sinuses to obtain different values for aqueous tissue, soft tissue and air, respectively. Effective dose was calculated from the dose-length product.
RESULTS: The effective radiation dose which calculated for the control group scans was 0.037 ± 0.003 mSv. But, it was 0.0099 ± 0.001 mSv for the study group scans. The effective radiation dose of study group was statistically significant lower than control group (p < 0.001). Despite significant lowering of the radiation doses, image qualities were sufficient for evaluating all the bony structures, air-filled structures and soft tissues except for eye muscle, retrobulbar fat and eye bulb.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results present that our protocols for study and control group provide significant dose reduction without the loss of diagnostic image quality for paranasal sinus CT. Paranasal sinus CT imaging can be performed at very low radiation exposure maintaining high image quality using a single volume 320-row detector CT device using 135 kVp and 5 mAs.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Revascularization Strategy in Myocardial Infarction with Multivessel Disease.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024 March 27
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
Management of Diverticulitis: A Review.JAMA Surgery 2024 April 18
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app