We have located links that may give you full text access.
Dietary Intake Contributions of Food and Beverages by Source and Food Security Status in US Adults.
Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior 2017 September
OBJECTIVE: To compare the consumption patterns and diet quality of foods and beverages obtained from various sources by food security status.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of 2011-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data.
PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4,789 adults (aged >19 years) with dietary intake and food security data.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The contribution of foods and beverages to energy, nutrients, and diet quality by locations where food was obtained was compared across food security status.
ANALYSIS: Descriptive analysis and logistic regression.
RESULTS: Almost all US adults consumed food and beverages obtained from grocery stores, regardless of food security status (about 95%), which accounted for one half to two thirds of total macronutrient intakes. The diet quality of foods from grocery stores was better in highly food-secure adults. Convenience stores are used most by very low food-secure adults; those foods had the poorest diet quality profile. Dietary patterns of marginally food-secure adults more closely resembled sources and intakes of low and very low food-secure adults.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Food-insecure adults use food sources differently, resulting in diet quality differences of foods and beverages obtained. Place-based interventions in the food environment may have differential effects by food security status.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of 2011-2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data.
PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4,789 adults (aged >19 years) with dietary intake and food security data.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The contribution of foods and beverages to energy, nutrients, and diet quality by locations where food was obtained was compared across food security status.
ANALYSIS: Descriptive analysis and logistic regression.
RESULTS: Almost all US adults consumed food and beverages obtained from grocery stores, regardless of food security status (about 95%), which accounted for one half to two thirds of total macronutrient intakes. The diet quality of foods from grocery stores was better in highly food-secure adults. Convenience stores are used most by very low food-secure adults; those foods had the poorest diet quality profile. Dietary patterns of marginally food-secure adults more closely resembled sources and intakes of low and very low food-secure adults.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Food-insecure adults use food sources differently, resulting in diet quality differences of foods and beverages obtained. Place-based interventions in the food environment may have differential effects by food security status.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System: From History to Practice of a Secular Topic.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 5
Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use.European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2024 April 13
Revascularization Strategy in Myocardial Infarction with Multivessel Disease.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2024 March 27
Clinical practice guidelines on the management of status epilepticus in adults: A systematic review.Epilepsia 2024 April 13
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app