We have located links that may give you full text access.
Decreased patient exposure to ionizing radiation during interventional rheumatology procedures after optimization of protection.
OBJECTIVES: To decrease radiation exposure of patients undergoing interventional rheumatology procedures, without adversely affecting quality of care.
METHODS: The radiation dose received, assessed by the dose-area product (DAP), was measured during 283 intraarticular injections performed under fluoroscopic guidance between May and July 2013. Then, three steps were taken to decrease patients' radiation exposure: a copper filter was added, the anti-scatter grid was removed, and exposure cell sensitivity was set at the highest value. DAP was measured during 158 intraarticular injections performed in 2014 with these measures in place.
RESULTS: Mean DAP before optimization was 175μGray·m2 during facet joint injections (n=4) and 43μGray·m2 during hip injections but was less than 20μGray·m2 for injections into the shoulders (15.7μGray·m2 ), ankles (7.7μGray·m2 ), wrists (3.7μGray·m2 ), and fingers (3.3μGray·m2 ). After optimization, DAP decreased markedly for all injection sites, by 52% (shoulders) to 87% (facet joints, 22.7μGray·m2 ). Decreases occurred at all three steps of the procedure, i.e., patient installation, injection, and last image hold. Exposure during facet joint injections varied from 84 (54.5-108.5) μGray·m2 when body mass index (BMI) was <25kg/m2 to 228.9 (161.3-340.4)μGray·m2 when BMI was>30kg/m2 .
CONCLUSION: Simple technical changes translate into large decreases in patient radiation exposure during fluoroscopically-guided injections, particularly at the facet joints and in obese patients.
METHODS: The radiation dose received, assessed by the dose-area product (DAP), was measured during 283 intraarticular injections performed under fluoroscopic guidance between May and July 2013. Then, three steps were taken to decrease patients' radiation exposure: a copper filter was added, the anti-scatter grid was removed, and exposure cell sensitivity was set at the highest value. DAP was measured during 158 intraarticular injections performed in 2014 with these measures in place.
RESULTS: Mean DAP before optimization was 175μGray·m2 during facet joint injections (n=4) and 43μGray·m2 during hip injections but was less than 20μGray·m2 for injections into the shoulders (15.7μGray·m2 ), ankles (7.7μGray·m2 ), wrists (3.7μGray·m2 ), and fingers (3.3μGray·m2 ). After optimization, DAP decreased markedly for all injection sites, by 52% (shoulders) to 87% (facet joints, 22.7μGray·m2 ). Decreases occurred at all three steps of the procedure, i.e., patient installation, injection, and last image hold. Exposure during facet joint injections varied from 84 (54.5-108.5) μGray·m2 when body mass index (BMI) was <25kg/m2 to 228.9 (161.3-340.4)μGray·m2 when BMI was>30kg/m2 .
CONCLUSION: Simple technical changes translate into large decreases in patient radiation exposure during fluoroscopically-guided injections, particularly at the facet joints and in obese patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Consensus Statement on Vitamin D Status Assessment and Supplementation: Whys, Whens, and Hows.Endocrine Reviews 2024 April 28
The Tricuspid Valve: A Review of Pathology, Imaging, and Current Treatment Options: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 26
Intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine during the surgery to prevent postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European Journal of Medical Research 2024 April 19
Interstitial Lung Disease: A Review.JAMA 2024 April 23
Management of Diverticulitis: A Review.JAMA Surgery 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app